Please, allow me to introduce you to Mr. Waltz as rebuking proof to your statement

Waltz, unlike Hegseth, is not a random idiot, he definitely knows better.

I’m pressing X to doubt so hard rn

And yet you cannot disprove a direct correlation between the two events, so, until we won’t have a bigger dataset to analyse, both our opinions are equally valid; even if a policy change in the time span of a day and against the economic interests of this institution would skewer the hypothesis towards my interpretation rather than yours, but I want to give you the benefit of the doubt. Hopefully we’ll have this increased dataset available in a short time ;)

To answer your question: more or less all of them. Or at least a great majority (70-80% at least), all of the people who you cited in your list are out for blood against the lower classes so I don’t see anything wrong in defending ourselves from these beasts.

They’ll have to be successful 100% of the times to avoid being killed, we will need just one successful try to reach our goal

Blue shield policy on anesthesia was changed the day after the assassination.

Policies have been changed and no pie was involved