There is irony in making someone with your name explain themselves

The real question is why the hell is a governor engaging in international trade or diplomacy? Art. 1 Sec 8.

9/10 sovereign citizens are victims. 1/10 are charlatans selling a fiction to those in dire need of a way out of legal trouble.

If any store decides I need to ask an employee to read the nutritional facts on the back of a can of soup I will never shop there.

The solution isn’t locks it’s fixing the underlying problem.

What do you think DNA is? The thing outside a criminals’s gloves? IRL isn’t CSI Miami. Go swap a NYC sidewalk and see what you get. That’d be a needle in a haystack.

Remember, they only have to prove “beyond a reasonable doubt”.

This is like saying remember marathon runners only need to run 26.2 miles.

It’s not having our “head [in our] asses” it’s a decent respect for the freestanding system of laws. Social media vilianizing or martyrizing people alleged of cromes isn’t beneficial for true justice.

Did he give a sperm sample or something at the crime seen? What DNA?

And public defenders though they are as skilled as any attorney are very much overworked in many places. Private counsel can offer more attention to the details of a case and spend time researching potentially novel theories to defend their client.

wild misinformation ads would be OK too…

Yes. Because the government is not the supreme arbiter of truth. If someone wants to put out an advert saying the sky is yellow they can. Our society functions on the principle that an open market of ideas will result in the best ideas prospering while a closed market of ideas would stifle new better ideas.

Not sure on all the specifics of CA’s admittance structure, beyond they banned race base admission in the '90s in favor of a system that guaranteed admissions to top percentile students.

But post Students for Fair Admissions DEI measures are still ok. Schools can’t use race alone as a plus or minus but they may choose to favor those from disadvantaged neighborhoods, 1st generation college students, and even good essays that share someone’s experience being a race.

Thank you for sharing this clear and succinct comment. Looked through the article and didn’t see it formated so clearly.

Possibly a rule 2/6 (opinion) issue. Not sure if you guys care on an article by article basis or just by source. Headline alone is pretty charged language.

Legislation on packaging should really be entertained as well. For many products a biodegradable form of packaging would be completely viable.

Local affiliates and independent papers tend to be much better.

I liked it. Even a biased MBFC that is consistent in it’s bias has value, as you can take the bias into perspective on interpreting the rating.

Yeah, the real impact of this will just be further alienation of trans youths.

Percentage based commissions is such a weird standard for pay. As if there is something inherit in the sale of any and every $275k home that merits $1,250 more in compensation than would be owed for a $250k home.

Sounds basically like Color Psychology which has been around for a bit

Reminds me of the case of Carol Anne Bond

He’s referencing Gaige Grosskreutz who had a Glock. Anthony Huber was the one who attempted to use a skateboard as a bludgeon. Joseph Rosenbaum attempted to take Rittenhouse’s rifle after he had tried to distance himself.

https://youtu.be/GrVKqTCdM-A

Grosskreutz was hit in the arm and testified to aiming his pistol at Rittenhouse during the televised trial.

https://www.tpr.org/arts-culture/2022-03-28/art-history-and-controversy-come-to-a-head-in-downtown-san-antonio

The installation was mocking them not idolizing them.

Supporters have countered with reminders that the piece is historical satire — a mocking of Lenin and Mao — and a criticism of communism.

I’ll caveat that not all changes are ‘good’ changes too. The future generations might not value the things we hold dear, like the jury trial. One day maybe they’ll sadly see that as us wasting ordinary people’s time.

People in the future are not automatically our betters, but our equals, (hopefully) armed with the knowledge of our failings and armed with that of our successes.