I would not be surprised if in a month it turns out a bunch of those don’t match with the crimes

Oh! Now I know what this is. It’s not “mail voting is bad, let’s not mail vote”. It’s “let’s use X to vote”

Plot twist (just for fun, I’m not trying to protect him): he actually wasn’t. The votes were fake and whoever were faking them dropped the ball by using info of someone recognizable

To me it looks like the judge wants something to be seen. Wealthy-and-connected privilege? Maybe even these documents show how deep into the known names this hole runs? Without the ambiguity of “the only documented thing is a dinner”

But I’m not an expert on the issue and judges in general, so maybe I’m misinterpreting something

I would also keep the “on speed” part. Even if the band aren’t users

Running out of gambles, eh?