If a super virus that could kill us all escaped… you would hear about it like this.

Good to know your true colors.

I understand his anger in general. They just doesn’t differentiate freind or foe when they vent their anger. That said, I explained in a direct response to them how it’s still not technically tax funded. They actually alude to that when they say “everyone involved knew where the money came from”. The organizations used loopholes to indirectly pay for those building. Those loop holes would ensure they are not technically tax funded. So a ban on tax funding religious buildings wouldn’t apply.

So if I assume those building you speak of were paid for by the grants the link mentioned. What are theynused for. Cause the grants are to pay an organization to provide social services.

If you pay an organization with tax money to provide a service, assumably with some profit built in. And they use the profit to build a building… you are stretching to call is tax funded. And my point holds up to this. A ban on tax funded religious building would not legally ban this.

Your pretty antagonistic to someone who litterally wants the same thing as you. I just want to be sure people are rallying around something that will actually achieve the goal. I want religious organization to recieve no special treatment compare to any other. Removing their tax exempt status is the goal with the biggest impact. Entirely getting rid of the office of faith based … is also a great goal. And I support doing that too. Banning tax funded structure for religious organizations wouldn’t do anything.

Think about it. They could sell the land and buildings to a charity they control that rents the church back to them. Then get the grants to build the gyms and such. Their core finances are still under a religious organization, but the buildings are technically owned by a non-religious organization.

Thats not how tax funded works. Tax funded is when the gov uses tax money to pay for something. What you are describing is paying for something using tax savings from tax exempt status. If you supported a bill banning tax funded religous buildings, I don’t think it would stop anything currently happening right now.

There is a difference between tax funded and tax exempt. I say this because we should be specifically asking that the tax exempt status for religions be removed from the tax code.

Reading this tells me the guy doesn’t know much about AI. It just isn’t as simple. You have multiple real people involved in anything an AI does. So which one is resposible… The people who built the AI model? The people who built an agent on top of the model? The person who told it to do what it did? I mean, certainly it isn’t the AI. At least he has that part right…

I can really do this with my boss. He is so disorganized and bad with time management that he misses things in slack all the time. So I can just say I missed that message… are you sure you sent it. And he really doesn’t know if he did.

I wish

So I do find this kind of interesting. The feds can’t tell a state how to run their election. But usps is a federal entity. So I don’t see why trump can’t tell them not to handle ballots. I don’t like it, but I am not really sure there is sound legal recourse.

Why not? Emotion is a biochemical reaction. So it can be simulated.

I’m not even allowed to see my kids medical record without their consent. Unless we are talking a young child her, I would say just call it medical information. Case closed.

Seems reasonable to me. I am very much against the concentration of capital. But that is a major part of the socialist democrats platform. So yeah, your post was clearly political. The lemmy model is that mods choose what they want in a community. And since they are unpaid, that seems right. You want to say whatever you want, make your own.

It did say annoying. Christianity isn’t all that annoying. You would have to go with like the door to door type religions first. And of course evangelical christians fit that bill.

They may not even care about removing her from the bench. Just the accusation allows them to stir up their base and increase their voter counts.

Nuerotypical.

My autistic son wouldn’t eat any of those. Not even one. I wish he would.
But it looks like a sampler for just about any NT kid I’ve known.

I was mainly referring to the “this has nothing to do with fraud” part. I should have been more explicit. The rest is great data from good research. That part I applaud.

I wish I didn’t have to say this but, duh. Anyone smart enough to know lemmy exists knows all this. (This is not a statement saying you shouldn’t say what you said. It is an endorsement of the statement you made)

10 through 18 look like the bristolstool chart