I was going to say. I’m sure this will be great… for all 25 new homes built in CA that year!

I’m frankly rather concerned about the idea of crowdsourcing or voting on “reliability”, because - let’s be honest here - Lemmy’s population can have highly skewed perspectives on what constitutes “accurate”, “unbiased”, or “reliable” reporting of events. I’m concerned that opening this to influence by users’ preconceived notions would result in a reinforced echo chamber, where only sources which already agree with their perspectives are listed as “accurate”. It’d effectively turning this into a bias bot rather than a bias fact checking bot.

Aggregating from a number of rigorous, widely-accepted, and outside sources would seem to be a more suitable solution, although I can’t comment on how much programming it would take to produce an aggregate result. Perhaps just briefly listing results from a number of fact checkers?

• Economic points are limited to plans gestures about taxes. Nothing about tackling corporate-induced inflation / shrinkflation.

• Nothing about supporting workers’ rights and aiding labor organizations.

• Nothing about building a stronger regulatory framework and tackling loophole use by corporations and ultrawealthy.

• Nothing here on continuing to support US allies and build international partnerships.

I recognize none of these are exactly keystone domestic culture war issues, and also all more or less reflect where she stood on Biden’s major pushes. But I’m still disappointed these all go unmentioned.