Is this the law that has exceptions for undercover, environmental, and weather?

Meaning the only reason to be against it is to avoid accountability?

He will. He just reminded them of what their oath already says, and that it only applies to lawful orders. “Just following orders” does not protect you from prosecution for following illegal orders.

The UCMJ does not define what “lawful” means directly. However, the Rules for Courts-Martial say that an order is lawful, “unless it is contrary to the Constitution, the laws of the United States, or lawful superior orders or for some other reason is beyond the authority of the official issuing it.”

The two oaths, for context:

The Oath of Enlistment (for enlisted):
“I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.”

The Oath of Office (for officers):
“I, _____, having been appointed an officer in the _____ (Military Branch) of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God.”

For what? They’re already buying shit the military has said for years they don’t need (things like Tanks and APCs) because Congress uses it as a jobs program.

These seem like sane recommendations somehow.

Encouraging limiting highly processed food, eating whole foods like fruits and vegetables, incorporating healthy fats, prioritizing protein-rich meals, dairy with no added sugars, and reducing refined carbohydrates.

They won’t. They won’t pay to completely recreate things like Silicon Valley and Hollywood elsewhere.

Just like they’re not leaving New York despite saying they would. All the Finance infrastructure is there, they won’t recreate it from scratch elsewhere.

One of the many Easter Eggs in the Series. Just like ET’s species being in the galactic Senate.

Canadians, why were you drinking so much Jim Beam? Didn’t you have a minimum quality level you’d accept? There were better Canadian options available in the US, why would you settle for that swill?

I mean that’s obvious. Otherwise you’re just paying $45 to ignore the security checkpoint if you’re guaranteed to get through with payment.

One could argue surveillance and tracking is about security. They’d be wrong. But they could argue that.

It’s amazing how Twitter keeps managing to fuck these things up. They seem to have no concept of testing anymore.

Musk keeps trying to play propaganda minister and pushing nazi shit, but never checks things before implementing them. At times it seems like the only explanation is that he actually believes the lies about how “it’s all the Democrats”. Then he has to panic and run things back when that inevitably turns out to be projection and it exposes Republican bullshit and foreign interference.

Do you think he personally signs the checks?

Of course not. Just like he doesn’t personally handle the payments for his businesses that don’t pay contractors. I guarantee it was his decision to actively not pay them though.

I don’t know why you keep wanting to talk about snap

Because it’s a recent example of the Trump administration actively choosing not to make payments that are owed, and are even normally handled automatically.

Not sure how you’re missing the relevance to whether they are not making other owed payments related to similar events.

What are you going off of?

You mean about Trump not paying people?

Because that’s well documented for decades, across his businesses, even as recently as the East Wing demolition.

Or do you mean about the money already being available and Trump choosing not to distribute it?

SNAP’s Contingency Reserve Is Available for Regular SNAP Benefits, as USDA and OMB Have Ruled in Past

Not 100% sure, but they should have received all their back pay including OT.

Maybe they will, maybe they won’t.

SNAP benefit money was already approved by Congress specifically during government shutdowns because of those issues in the past. The money was already allocated. Trump chose to have the administration not process that.

Note this is not ICE. This is the Diplomatic Security Service, the State Department’s agents.

It’s not just ICE that get the dipshits nowadays apparently.

This wasn’t a couple months free trial. This was something offered for 5 years, and now the economics have changed. It’s not at all what you’re trying to imply.

Isn’t California’s map dependent on the Texas one going into effect? That was the original wording at least back when it was first introduced.

Of course. They’re massively profitable.

1. You can ignore half the emissions standards requirements

2. People want them because they’re scared of driving a smaller vehicle while the other massive trucks on the road can crush them.

3. They always talk about the ability to move things like furniture or equipment or things like thag despite only doing that twice a year, and rentals existing, including directly from places like Lowe’s and Home Depot.

4. People are willing to pay a premium because they mistakenly think that bigger vehicles cost substantially more to make because bigger must mean a lot more material, despite most of a vehicle being empty space.

For those that don’t know, even if the annual vaccination doesn’t target the dominant specific strain that year, it still provides more protection than no vaccine!

Other countries actually passed laws and planned for the removal from circulation. Businesses had rules for how to handle it.

None of that happened here. This was done entirely without any plans for implementation. There are no rules for businesses to follow.

Why did ICE arrest a US citizen? That’s not their jurisdiction. If he did commit an arrestable offense, which is unlikely, local PD should be handling that. Period.