I said nothing about solving any problems because I agree, systems need to be changed from within (not that anybody expected a big systemic change after just one dead CEO like you imply). Workers’ rights did improve partly due to violence throughout history, though, but that’s not my point.
My point is Nazis can’t be fixed.
Gotta start somewhere.
If it were about quality of service, you would tip before receiving the service. The waiter doesn’t know how much you’re gonna tip, so their quality of service will never change.
YouTube is free, accessible and innovative, though? That meme doesn’t make a lot of sense.
Dude, don’t bury your uncle of he isn’t dead. That’s extremely impolite!
The real POV would be a closed bedroom door.
Here’s an article where Conway says trump won’t prosecute Clinton from November 2016, few days after the election: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38069585.amp
Bill Barr entered office as trump’s AG in February 2019: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Barr
I can write a manifesto that says “when I’m king I will make the sun rise in the morning and make it go down in the evening”. That doesn’t mean I’m responsible for that.
You successfully dragged me into an argument over something that was never my point and I will respectfully end it now.
The entire world is shifting right, it’s what happens in less economically stable times. Granted, Americans may actually sit by, watching their country slip into even more authoritarianism but I think you’re putting way too much weight on this stupid manifesto.
So, what you’re saying is it’ll happen regardless of trump winning or losing? Because all I said is that trump is a blowhard that quickly loses interest, a point that still stands and has nothing to do with project25.
Being a tyrant takes energy he just doesn’t have. He’s a tired old man desperately trying to get elected to get out of his legal troubles.
Um, you brought up democrats when you said a democrat being president didn’t stop its momentum and “the loss of rights is happening under democrats watch”.
No, my response is, democrats act on a 20-year-plan by Charlie Kirk, really? Or is it possible the causation you see is merely a correlation? “The loss of rights” seems awfully vague to me. What policies did democrats specifically implement that go back to that manifesto?
What momentum? Maga? Didn’t the fat guy lose the election?
These idiots are not going to magically be in the majority over night. How many tough guys write manifestos like that every day? Sorry I’m not scared by some big words by Charlie Kirk.
I know about the boogeyman. Not even Americans are going to sit down and watch this happen.
He’s the exact same impotent blowhard. Not even his cronies will change that. He’ll lose interest the minute he’s elected, just like with Clinton.
Sure thing, just like he locked Clinton up. Why does anyone believe the stupid shit this idiot says?
“I’m gonna use a word I really shouldn’t use. But people might get mad at me for doing so. But on the other hand, the word is really edgy and cool… That’s it! I’ll just cover up part of the word so people don’t notice I’m using it! I’m so smart!”
Oh no, a 200% tariff that he’ll recall 48 hours later? How scary! Anything but that!