*the three of us.

Keeper

2 pillow connoisseur here, it’s not perfect but it’s def better than being a 1 pillow andy.

Accurate

More like genocide, authoritarianism and natural disasters.

“We used to deal with real shit” aight grandpa we got it you can go sleep and dwell on it again now.

Why does this analogy make sense to me for some reason?

Indeed they seem to be particular proud about all the right and wrong things.

Nice

Yeah I mean it’s like bullying someone for not going into the finance field. It’s not the others that are stupid, you are just being a dick for no reason at that point. They should at least hate on her for acting if at all.

Because currently there is no one standing before the court interested in transparency. That’s only a lower priority obligation for the judge, and if the judge allows it maybe court TV, an independent journalist or other media can argue it through an amicus brief.

You know what, there’s a small chance they would if they knew. But let’s say the Pentagon stopped all silos and kept it hush. Russia and China would never know whether they stopped or where remaining ones would be.

It’s not the weapons itself that protect the USA but solely the fact they are probably somewhere and they know how to trigger them.

This is overkill. In every aspect. Need, justification, budget, maintenance. The definition of a US defense department toy. It’s a flex. But it’s a covert flex, which is the definition of stupid. We’re not talking trap track but government decisions and that boggles my mind.

NGL it’s kind of a brilliant way to make Netanyahu show his true intentions to the Israeli public.

I’m confused now. The commenter says they have high factuality but the bot says they have medium credibility.

What does that mean? Isn’t credibility very tightly linked to factuality?

I wanna see the evidence and the law in this case

This is gonna be interesting af

Having stakes in a conflict really tints your perspective even for those respectable organizations… That’s annoying.

I noticed the same with aljazeera. They are regarded as really good neutral journalists on a whole list of topics. I honestly didn’t expect a very foreign news organization to have such nuanced takes, but they consistently made a better job in their reporting than a lot of US or EU journalists. But when it came to something they are involved in, you can see their neutral reporting slowly decay - it’s sad to watch.

whistleblower documents

Usually that stuff is not released for the benefit of the state, but against the state. And I really hope he realizes he just put children in the crossfire of a political debate that has become very extreme and heated.

Sorry but even with his policies in mind, this is more than neglectful for the children’s safety. What the fuck.

Good.

I didn’t expect this strong and transparent sign of opposition, but now that it’s there, I like it.

I know people will have much more radical stances on this, but it doesn’t sound like that Title IX is limited to discrimination of biological gender only. It looks to me like they were trying to aim higher, for discrimination in general. At least if I get the jist of the Title. That would make this ruling legally questionable as well. This raises more issues because in case of intentionality this might become a separation of powers issues where the judicial branch is trying to make a law something that it isn’t, therefore acting in the role of the legislative branch. That’s some serious shit.

I’m saying this because obviously morally this is repulsive already, but I wanted to show that legally there’s some shaky stuff going on as well imo.

Obligatory IANAL.

Btw random fact: it turned out that the reason his Long-Form birth certificate was looking photoshopped was printer error.

I saw that in a really awesome talk of a big data scientist who found the printer issue and gave a talk about his story and the journey to get it fixed. His name is David Kriesel if you wanna look him up, but the talk’s in German.

It seems to me a lot more people give a shit. The one’s that don’t are very vocal rn.

It wasn’t always like that tho, and politicians still only pander to the loud minority of people, that’s why racists get more attention. And that’s not great.