

I would think that if an FBI director wanted a person dead, you’d be hearing about how he did it, rather than how he desired it.
Also, I once used seashells to write “69ME”, but nothing happened, to my disappointment.
I would think that if an FBI director wanted a person dead, you’d be hearing about how he did it, rather than how he desired it.
Also, I once used seashells to write “69ME”, but nothing happened, to my disappointment.
I would think that if an FBI director wanted a person dead, you’d be hearing about how he did it, rather than how he desired it.
That will be the safest plane in the sky. Where else are foreign governments going to find an imbecile as easily manipulated as Trump? They must keep him safe.
On the other hand, I hope they installed a spy cam in the bathrooms. Trump on a changing table while his aides tend his diapers would be hilarious.
The article stated that there were three shooters, and only two gunshot wounds. I seem to recall from the early '70s that firing squads of five people or so always secretly loaded one weapon with blanks. That way the shooters could all convince themselves that they were the one who had the blank if their conscience bothered them. Maybe these guys did the same thing but with only three shooters…
So that’s not stubble on any of them. It’s diaper face.
And it’s not available 24/7 online… why? I’d love to see the click counter on that bad boy.
Edit: I thought this was the other interview. Okay, make 'em both available. The ad revenue alone will be tremendous.
A strange sort of prostitution. Everyone gets fucked, but only a certain few get paid.
Or, as we call it, “prostitution”. Except instead of a teenth of crack and $5, the president is available for a meme coin.
Afterwards, get yourself checked.
It’s the concept of a Constitution, not an actual one.
During this administration I think the SaA is using nutmeg - less potent.
Actually, if nobody steps up and busts his ass for this, the crisis is over. So is the Constitution.
Sergeant at Arms, I think you’re up.
I’m very sorry to hear this. In the past, the thing that a poor leader could do to remain in power was to start a war. Then the leader could spout all the “don’t change horses midstream” rhetoric to remain in power rather than being replaced. The only thing that will stave off war would be his incredible narcissism and refusal to believe “fake” polls. Once he’s convinced, however… who’s the lucky recipient of an invasion?
Then the “out” press pool can just make stuff up, since they have to guess. “Donald Trump walked out of the bathroom and into a press briefing one hour ago. While we don’t know what the press briefing is about, we can state that before going to the bathroom Trump was seen finishing a cheeseburger. Walking out, he was seen licking his fingers. Our reporter notes that there was no sound of running water prior to Trump’s emergence from the bathroom.”
So each fired employee saves, let’s say, $75,000. Then each sues the government and wins a $250,000 settlement, and gets their job back. Of course the government spends $300,000 on lawyers for each case. The savings practically leap into our pockets!
I don’t believe it 'til I hear it from the First Lady himself. What does Don say?
God damn, every time I think this douche can’t get any worse… There’s no bottom (well, to be fair Trump is his bottom}
“Black Sunday is a 1975 novel by American writer Thomas Harris…”
Hope not, though. Too many innocents.
I wonder if it would make more sense for people to make appointments at their nearest firing range, for basic firearm safety training. Just, you know, in case a burglar burgles a home or something. If the government saw that 10,000 people went for training this weekend, they’d feel better about our safety. And more could join in next weekend.
I’ve seen a lot of these dumbass headlines recently, with double- and triple- and quadruple-negatives instead of clear, concise terms. They’re all like, “Appeals court rules against judge who declined to block restriction imposed by lower court on disabling injunction on tariffs…”.
Hint to newsies: If I have to diagram your damned headline to see if it’s “Yes” or “No”, rewrite it.