When President Joe Biden said “journalism is not a crime” last April, federal prosecutors in Tampa, Florida, apparently took that as a challenge. Not a crime yet.

The next month, FBI agents raided the home of journalist Tim Burke. He is scheduled to be arraigned in the coming weeks under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) and wiretap laws for finding and disseminating unaired Fox News footage of Kanye West’s antisemitic rant to Tucker Carlson. The indictment doesn’t accuse Burke of hacking or deceit. Instead, its theory is that he didn’t have permission to access the video, even though it was at a public, unencrypted URL that he found using publicly posted demo credentials.

But finding things that the powerful don’t want found is essentially the definition of investigative journalism—which, as Biden said, is not criminal in this country.

A recent court filing heightens concerns about whether prosecutors hid from the judge who authorized the raid that Burke was a journalist. By doing so, they may have avoided scrutiny of whether their investigation—and eventual indictment—of Burke complied with the First Amendment, federal law, and the Department of Justice’s own policies.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240327115632/https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/03/joe-biden-doj-journalist-tim-burke-arraignment.html

  • AngryishHumanoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly I’m all for freedom of the press bit there’s a lot of nuance here as to whether what he did was legal… He didn’t explicitly have permission to access what he accessed so it’s definitely a gray area which is exactly what the courts are supposed to decide.

    • forrgott@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nuance? Yeah, no. Fox published it to a publicly accessible URL. Permission is irrelevant. Nothing more than a large corporation manipulating the system to cover their ass.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s not that much nuance, actually.

      It’s equivalent to someone plugging in the default password to luggage locks knowing full well it’s not their luggage.

      He wasn’t authorized to access those files, it really doesn’t matter how he came by the credentials.

      It also really doesn’t matter that he’s a journalist. Journalists aren’t allowed to break the law, even if he’s going after a scumbag like West.

      This differs from the Marion county raid in that they accessed public information (actual public information. That the server interacts with the public doesn’t make it public) and received files from people who were authorized to access it. No crimes were committed by the journalists.

      This differs from Assange in that Assange merely received the files and published them. Assange didn’t steal the files himself.

        • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Exactly, the people that conflate legality with morality have the poorest of moral compasses. It’s sad how many people just stop at this stage of moral development.

          In these times, with what is being made legal(child labor) and illegal(abortion) that should be more obvious than ever.