• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Okay. Fair enough. He tried.

    And he failed.

    So what would the point of Biden trying be exactly? Because it sounds purely performative and the Senate already wastes way too much time on performative bullshit.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        He could literally do nothing about the Dobbs decision. It was entirely out of his hands. The executive branch does not control the judicial branch. That’s the whole point of the separation of powers.

    • Sybil@lemmy.worldBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      he could introduce a constitutional amendment. he could pack the court. he could do something.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A constitutional amendment takes a supermajority of congress and 2/3rds of the states to ratify it. That is literally impossible for Biden to achieve.

        We already talked about how he would fail at packing the courts.

        I think you don’t really have a good understanding of how the U.S. government works.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re right. He didn’t try to do something purely performative that was almost certain to fail in a big waste of time and taxpayer money.

            Because that would have been pretty fucking stupid.