Carlson mainstreamed antisemitism for a long time, and conservatives seemed not to care. Then he set his sights on Israel.

  • John Richard@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    IMO the article is trash. It uses every chance to suggest that telling the truth about Israel is anti-jew and antisemitism. There is this problem people have where they grow to hate people so much like Trump or Tucker Carlson that if they said something so basic like that the Earth is round, you’d have people wanting to suddenly suggest it is flat cause they can’t imagine someone they hate ever saying something correct.

    There are a lot of reasons to dislike Tucker Carlson. However, not everything your enemy says or does has to be incorrect. In fact, believing that to be the case only makes you weak and vulnerable to being manipulated yourself.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      However, not everything your enemy says or does has to be incorrect.

      I mean…what he’s saying is incorrect though. I think what Israel is doing is horrendous and should’ve been stopped as soon as possible, but this is what he is focusing on -

      “A consistent but almost never noted theme of American foreign policy is that it is always the Christians who suffer,” the broadcaster said at the start of Tucker Carlson Uncensored. “When there’s a war abroad that the United States is funding, it is Christians who tend to die disproportionately.”

      He doesn’t give a shit about what’s actually happening. He just wants to use it to prop up this “Christian oppression” narrative to pander to his audience, and feel righteous blaming Israel while he’s at it.

      • John Richard@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Did you read the full article because it also lists several valid points that he made and then attempts to equate everything as anti-jew and antisemitism. What he said may not be accurate, but saying something bad about Israel does not equate to being anti-jew or antisemitic

        • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          The article talks about Israeli oppression of Palestinians is bad. It’s quite clear that is not the same as antisemitism. It doesn’t condemn anti-Israel stuff, it condemns antisemitism.

          It also makes the point that religious right wingers don’t care about antisemitism, just the anti-Israel stuff, which I think is an important takeaway.

          Not trying to be rude, but it kinda seems like the person you’re replying to read it more thoroughly than you did.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Did you read the full article because it also lists several valid points that he made and then attempts to equate everything as anti-jew and antisemitism.

          This is extremely vague. Can you be more specific?

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Believe me, I’m not trying to defend the article. I didn’t read it because I don’t want to give that shit views. But I’m not about to defend this asshole who’s not even pretending to give a shit about the actual people dying. Both parties can be wrong.

          • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t see any direct quote of Tucker (mind you I don’t believe him to be an actual news analyst myself) in this article. Supposedly he praised the “strength” of Hama’s (the word strength is the only word quoted here). It’s also mentioned (without quote) he said Israel is hurting Christians.

            The rebuttal by the article author:

            It’s true that Palestinian Christians are suffering, though it’s largely because they are Palestinians rather than because they are Christians.

            The author sees hypocrisy in the right media:

            Substantively, it shows that the right is willing to forgive or downplay antisemitism unless it’s somehow linked to criticism of Israel — in which case there’s a zero-tolerance policy.

            Unless I missed it, we need to find an additional source to see what Tucker said. I’m not really down for a dumpster dive into a Tucker “news” rabbit hole.

            • Ech@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I literally provided a direct quote. You not feeling “down’” to verify it isn’t really anyone else’s problem.

                • Ech@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Ok? It’s a bad article. So what? What do you expect anyone else to do about that? You demand information, information that is very easily found, yet refuse to make any effort yourself. What an entitled, lazy position to take.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It uses every chance to suggest that telling the truth about Israel is anti-jew and antisemitism.

      ? A whole section of the article is about using legitimate criticisms of Israel to push antisemitism. And then even talks about how antisemitism is okay with the right, unless it’s linked to criticism of Israel.

      In fact, where do they even paint any criticism of Israel as antisemitic?