Trump won USA Presidential Elections 🎉🇺🇸😁😁 Who is going to celebrate tonight? 🍾🎈

I do truly look forward for it 🤗

  • Cris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I really liked not living in a fascist country that hates minorities…

    • max55@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      70
      ·
      5 months ago

      What about the ban of unvaccinted from society under Biden regime? That wasn’t a problem?

        • max55@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          59
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well, then you should study what fasicm is. It’s vilification of group in society which you blame for problems you made. It already happened in Germany before.

          • Sundial@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            5 months ago

            That’s not fascism or the vilification of a group. It’s just common sense and for the greater good. Fascism is what the US is about to have for the next 4 years under Trump. And hopefully it’s only 4 years.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s vilification of group in society which you blame for problems you made

            I think you should definitely let Umberto Eco know that his generally accepted definition of fascism is totally wrong. Of course, he did die in 2016, so that will be difficult.

            On the other hand, unlike you, he actually lived in a fascist state and experienced fascism first-hand, so maybe he knew a thing or two about it.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ur-Fascism

            • max55@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              30
              ·
              5 months ago

              Thank you - those are the snippets:

              • The cult of action for action’s sake"
              • “Disagreement is treason”
              • Appeal to a frustrated middle class"
              • "Fear of difference
              • “Pacifism is trafficking with the enemy” because “life is permanent warfare”

              This was the Covid cult under Biden regime and it match it pretty well. Also with Mass Formation as described by Mattias Desmet.

      • Cris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You’re not entitled to recklessly endangering everyone around you. Thats not a freedom anyone has. Thats not a freedom anyone SHOULD have

          • Cris@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yes, you have the right not to vaccinate, but if you do, your presence will jepordize the saftey of anyone around you, particularly those who medically can’t vaccinate.

            It is not oppression to say that if you make a medical choice that threatens other people’s safety, businesses and institutions and not required to allow you to risk the saftey of their other patrons

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Believe it or not, “unvaccinated” is not a gender, sexuality, ethnicity or religion.

        It’s a choice.

        You know what’s not a choice? Being queer or brown.

      • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        There was also that ban on drink driving, where measures were put in place to stop people doing things that could kill them and just as likely others, but it meant you no longer have the FREEDOM to control what goes into your body and do what you want.

        Good regulations exist for a reason - you are welcome to show me your doctorate dissertation that disagrees.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is where the convoluted system our founders instituted keeps us from descending into anarchy.

      People in each state vote for a slate of Electors, who are then bound to vote for the candidate that won in that state, and then the new Congress counts the votes. If a candidate dies before taking office, there are various opportunities for humans (State legislators, electors, Congress) to step in and make a substitution that reflects the will of the people.

      And yes, even in states run by Democrats, the legislature and/or electors would probably act to install Vance if Trump incurs God’s Ultimate Veto, because they respect the will of the people.

      The only tricky part comes if Trump bites it after EC votes are cast, but before Congress counts them. Members might have a legitimate beef about accepting votes for a deceased candidate. They will probably do it, though. Then we would have to see what happens on inauguration day when the new President is unavailable to serve. In all likelihood, we end up with President Vance anyway.

      • FelixCress@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        That’s helpful, thank you.

        What if they both (Trump and Vance) die before the electoral college vote?

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          You realize that you just got put on an FBI list, right?

          Anyway, assuming those electors get rejected during the certification process (and they should, at that point, as neither candidate would be able to serve), then Congress gets to choose, with the House choosing the President and the Senate choosing the VP. They can choose whoever they want. But one twist is that each State delegation gets one vote, so California’s 52 Reps get the same vote as Wyoming’s lone rep. The math looks like even if Democrats somehow take control of the House, they may not have enough State delegations to matter in a contingent election.

          If enough states are tied that the Presidential vote fails (which is unlikely afaik), the VP vote in the Senate is a straight vote and that person would likely end up President anyway.

          If the unfortunate event happens between Jan 6 and Jan 20, and both men are selected but neither can serve, I imagine it would be treated like both positions are vacant at the same time, and the Speaker of the House becomes President on Jan 20

          • FelixCress@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Thank you, that’s quite insightful.

            You realize that you just got put on an FBI list, right?

            On a completely unrelated matter - what if both Trump, Vance and all Republican members of House and Senate suddenly die? 😂

      • Paddzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        I know you’re either very very stupid or a effective troll. But that immigrant can’t run for white house because he isn’t American and never will be.

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    Celebrating a campaign that literally said their plans will cause recession. Good luck with your economic anxiety Republicans.