• ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    What a non-story. Idiots do idiot things like not rack a slide and safe a weapon, then point it at someone and pull the trigger. Holy fuck.

    Then we give them driver’s licenses.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      What a non-story.

      These 277 deaths could have been prevented with magazine disconnects. Not a non-story.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        So in that same period of time, 810 people died from being hit by lightning. Maybe we need to mandate people walk around with grounding straps on their clothing and all doors automatically lock people in if it’s raining.

        If you feel like pearl clutching some more, maybe worry about how many gun owners don’t have gun safes. I guarantee, that’s responsible for far more deaths than idiots that can’t safe a firearm.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    277 deaths in 25 years. 11 people per year.

    30% of Americans own guns.

    https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/06/22/the-demographics-of-gun-ownership/

    The population in 2000 was 282.2 million people, so roughly 84,660,000 gun owners.

    11/84,660,000 = such a small number, you need to represent it with scientific notation. By 2024 it’s even smaller. 11/100,470,000.

    No piece of technology is going to prevent such an edge case of human stupidity, if it weren’t the magazine issue, it would be something else.

    That being said, there’s another preventative measure, my first gun had a little red pop-up when a round was in the chamber:

    There was also a red marker if the safety was off:

    • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      It doesn’t really matter if it’s an edge case or not. 277 people died because of it, many children. That’s not ok. I understand that people will go to great lengths to defend (often illogically) what they feel is their right, but your rights end where someone else’s rights begin. 277 lives, even if it’s over 25 years, is not worth an unsecured bullet in the chamber. It’s not even worth one life.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        277 people… over 25 years. It’s statistically insignificant on a population of 300 million people.

        By point of comparison:

        https://www.cpsc.gov/Newsroom/News-Releases/2023/Nearly-Half-of-Incidents-with-Kids-and-Corded-Window-Coverings-Resulted-in-Death-GoCordless-to-Save-Lives

        “On average, about nine children under 5 years of age die every year from strangling in window blinds, shades, draperies and other window coverings with cords.”

        So 225 over 25 years. Again, not statistically significant.

        • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          A child dying from something that could have been prevented cannot be dismissed as a simple statistical insignificance. That’s the most cynical thing I’ve heard in a while.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Individual tragedies are never going to be prevented. You might as well mandate kids exist in giant hamster balls 24/7.

            Oh, but then they might suffocate.

            • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              It’s perfectly preventable in other countries. In the western world, this is pretty much a uniquely American experience.

              • jordanlund@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                You can’t undo the 2nd amendment, there are over 400 million guns in the country.

                The fact that there are only 11 deaths per year on a population of 400 million guns shows just how insignificant the problem is.

                It’s not even a “1 in a million” kind of thing.

                It’s a 1 in 36 million kind of thing.

                • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  It seems Trump has no problem advocating for undoing the 14th Amendment to ban birthright citizenship. If he does that, I see no problem undoing the 2nd Amendment.

  • AnalogJack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    In general I feel less safe handling the guns I own with a magazine disconnect than the ones without. Having to put a magazine into the gun to drop the hammer puts me on edge every time.