• Doug Holland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    Katie Porter is one of the very few good guys. She’d be a terrific governor for California, so I expect the Democratic Party will do all they can to oppose her.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      25 days ago

      Harris is going to run and don’t you know this was her promised consolation prize. So sorry progressives, maybe in a 100 years when everyone in line in front of you dies?

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        Yeah, I remember it being pitched right after the election. Idk, if Kamala actually runs on a progressive platform and doesn’t redshift like she did late in the election, I might consider her seriously.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          24 days ago

          She’s incapable of running a progressive campaign. You have to actually be Progressive to do that.

  • AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    25 days ago

    All she has to do is tell me she’s not going to fuck over consumers with regards to solar to protect regionally monopolistic power conglomerates who are literally killing people due to old equipment in wild fire corridors. Fuck Gavin Newsome.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      Sorry, best we can do is fuck everyone over to protect PG&E so they’ll only declare bankruptcy once every two years instead of every six months. What? Why would you say that privatized, de-regulated utilities were a mistake?

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    He’s got a good chance because she’s extremely popular outside of core Democratic hubs. Ita going to be a question of if she is willing to buck the system. Frankly, after the ratfucking of 2024, I think she could make real waves running as an independent; as a Democrat she’ll be open to the same weaknesses as we saw in the 2024 campaign.:DNC power brokers will quite litterally support fascists in their ability to win elections rather than have their own power challenged.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      In California they don’t do partisan primaries for state office. It will be her versus Harris the entire way no matter what she writes down for party affiliation.

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      25 days ago

      The democrats ran three decent options against the republicans in 2024 and the voters decided they’d rather sit out the election and let Trump win.

      It’s not some big involved conspiracy.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        Either you don’t understand California elections and their primary process or maybe you just missed this one. Or maybe, it’s something else…

        This cynical dismissal of history is why the Democratic party struggles as hard as they do. It’s deeply damaging to their ability to actually win elections across the board. Not addressing their failures, not addressing and showing up where they failed previously, and creating the narrative structure where Democratic failures can be dismissed: if you want to keep losing, keep doing these things.

        Anyways, here’s the article on Schiff ratfucking. It went further than this but it gets one started: https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/adam-schiffs-brazenly-cynical-campaign-strategy-boosts-a-republican/

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          25 days ago

          Schiff’s strategy is savvy but cynical. And it’s worked before. In 2012, when Missouri Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill was facing a tough reelection race, she started running ads before the GOP Senate primary that played up controversial US Representative Todd Akin. With an assist from McCaskill, Akin won the primary. Her scheme paid off when he infamously suggested that women who were victims of “legitimate rape” rarely get pregnant, and she easily dispatched him in November.

          I mean this is just politics, Trump and his campaign boosted Bernie in 2016 and 2020 because Trump knew he could wipe the floor with him.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            25 days ago

            That didn’t happen.

            And if it did, it wasn’t that bad.

            And if it was, that’s not a big deal. 👈

            And if it is, that’s not my fault.

            And if it was, I didn’t mean it.

            And if I did, you deserved it.

            Thanks for letting us know where we are in the process

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    24 days ago

    I can see Newsome already planning a 2028 run. She doesn’t seem like the type to challenge the party incumbent. He will most likely endorse her and focus on the 2028 campaign.