• mwproductions@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    The scam in question, from the article:

    McKcraken said he never requested a tree removal service and didn’t want any trees at his Forest Hills house — which he’s trying to sell — removed.

    “They’re trying to target vacant houses because the owners won’t know,” he said. “So that they can post themselves as the owner, and the owners won’t be home to stop it and won’t be home to notice it if the tree services do show up.”

    The Wilson County Sheriff’s Office said the scheme begins with a scammer calling or emailing a tree service company for a quote on how much it would be to cut down trees. After receiving an estimated amount, they send the company a faulty check for more than needed.

    Before the company realizes the checks are null and void, the scammer asks the company to pay back the difference.

    “They send you a check for $1,500, and they want you to send $500 back to them,” Adam Barbee with Arbor Sense said. “And then that way, they take $500, and you try to go cash the check, and the check is no good.”

    • lonerangers1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      1 year ago

      “They send you a check for $1,500, and they want you to send $500 back to them,” Adam Barbee with Arbor Sense said. “And then that way, they take $500, and you try to go cash the check, and the check is no good.”

      If someone sends me a check for $500 more than they should have, I would just have them send me another and void the incorrect one. Checks that don’t match invoices make for sloppy books.

        • zourn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Usually they camp it in language where they are only able to cut one check (company policy of one check per PO, for example), but they need to pay two people, you and another facilitator such as a transport service. The extra money is to pay for the transport service, which is actually also the scammer.

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Though in this case, the scammer is pretending to be a single person. But even if it was a company, the proper response is, “Well, I’ve already voided the check. Sort that shit out with your manager. We’ll do the work when the check clears.” That last line because the overpaying scam should be obvious these days. Sucks if you’re desperate for some work but that’s the kind of feeling these pieces of shit are targeting.

          • SeabassDan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Okay, that makes a lot more sense. I guess it just seems ridiculous because I don’t see myself trusting a check from anyone nowadays.