That the security changes after 9/11 weren’t intended to reduce civilian casualties but to limit the ability to kill or maim elected officials and members of the oligarchy or damage federal property and corporate architecture.

If isis employed the same level of planning on an attack on the security line they would likely make 9/11 numbers. That’s without the investment of tickets of flight schools etc.

And that’s not even considering simultaneous attacks at different airports.

I think we’re talking about different .1%s

What happens when someone opens up full auto or suicide vests that 3,000 person densely packed line?

This is about security for the .1% and their property. Not us.

If we always listened to “The People” we would still have a king.

Aaaaaaaaand here we fucking are.

Fishing for bribes imo.

Simmering here meaning molten slag that was once a pan.

The point isn’t to actually deport these people, it’s to give their employers and landlords a powerful tool to exploit them and prevent them from benefitting from any social services.

It would if our legal system wasn’t a sham. Unfortunately basically every “rule” it has is snapped off at the base from the lightest breath of a wealthy Pearson.

Ah yes. Cops the the rescue.

They literally couldn’t enact a fully passed bill preventing domestic abusers from owning guns because the police are full of them.

Are these the tankies everyone’s always talking about?

Several individually coordinated crimes and violent lyrics got the ICP a gang designation.

This motherfucker has had centrally planned riots and an attempted insurrection, has a jumping in process, has perpetrated stochastic terrorism campaigns, and is still invited to speak at public and campaign events.

It’s like perjury.

It’s only illegal when a Dem does it.

He won’t get charged with anything because DeCoRuM

If you are teaching or raising a family in Oklahoma here’s your sign.

I would love to hear Elon explain the complete process that is mail in voting.

The process is actually more secure than in person voting. Especially on a machine.

Idk I like the idea of expanding the court.

Preferably vertically, using a rack.

Good way to sell some books to the “undecided” voters

Even less so for a “democracy”

If fucking only.