Sure. But I stand by my position that the best I can do is what women consistently tell me they want me to do.

Yes, exactly.

Of course not. It was only three times where the problem was asking for consent to kiss, not only three times for consent period. My consent rejection list is considerably longer than 3.

Didn’t I see you in those threads about the women choosing bears over men supporting the idea of men listening when women tell men they need to change their behaviour? Why are you now attacking me for doing it?

What’s amusing is that these same people will, in other threads, bash men who take the only other feasible approach, which is the giving up you’re referring to. They want to have their cake and eat it, too: in this thread, it’s never ok to make a pass at a woman, but if you make a thread about being lonely, you’ll be told you’re a coward for not making passes at women.

Or, you know, give women what they are literally telling me they want, which is what I did.

I wish I lived in your world. I’ve had 3 rejections specifically because I asked for permission to kiss.

I’m very interested in how many posters in this thread are non-virgin men, because I’m not seeing any discussion of how behaviour like this is often absolutely necessary in order to get anywhere with a woman. Every woman I’ve ever met, including my current gf, has found explicit consent at every step an absolute mood-killer, and I’ve been rejected multiple times by other women for checking for it. I’m expected to sinply make an advance and give her the opportunity to reject it. I absolutely hate this, but it’s reality. I’m sure not all women are like the women I’ve met, and I don’t have hard numbers for you, but it’s also how every woman works in every movie, every book, every story about romance, so I’m sure most people reading this post at least understand what I’m referring to.

This article is written like a fever dream. Emphasis mine:

Cracker Barrel faces a critical challenge: Attracting younger diners. Currently, their core customer base are those over 65. Masino, who joined Taco Bell nine months ago, outlined a five-point turnaround plan during a recent earnings call to address this.

Generally speaking, every shot you fire in the air is a violent crime of negligence. That bullet is going to return to Earth at still-lethal velocity, largely because no-one ever fires straight up, so really all they’re doing is making long distance shots at a target they can’t see.

Exactly. You can be white-hispanic, black-hispanic, mixed race-hispanic. Listing only white-hispanic is bizarre.

No it isn’t, and claiming it is is racist af.

EDIT: The number of racists who aren’t aware Africa exists and are downvoting me accordingly is hilarious. Please, continue to demonstrate your unfathomable ignorance.

But that’s not how geometry works. If the black voters are uniformly distributed, it becomes impossible to have even a single majority-black district. It’d be like trying to draw apple juice divided into water and fructose districts.

In practice I doubt they’re uniformly distributed, but your math is terrible and such a fifth grader would deserve the F they got for employing it.

The study primarily focused on white-Black segregation, the groups that the Brown decision addressed, but found that white-Hispanic and white-Asian segregation both also more than doubled since the late 1980s in the large school districts.

What? You can be white and hispanic. You can be anything and hispanic.

And grammatically, “white-Black” is an abomination. Capitalize both or neither (preferably neither).

They don’t even take care of veterans properly, I doubt they’ll take care of the kid.

This lawsuit is explicitly about the opposite of that, holding his neighbors responsible for his actions, as if he were a toddler and they his parents.

Shouldn’t she be more scared of us? We have a space laser and we killed God according to her. What would possess her to cross us?

Tax deductibility is irrelevant; the cost of the practice pales in comparison to the profit of the practice, making the cost one of doing business.

That’s deeply inaccurate. When AZ became a state, the legislature at that time imported all their old laws into state law. The AZ court was correct when it found that there was simply nothing on the books invalidating that.

The idiots here are in the AZ legislature, not the AZ Supreme Court.

If you don’t know how to inspect a link before downloading it, that’s on you. You asked a question and I answered it by directly citing the source.

Did you post a meme about cow farts contributing to climate change or something?