

Sadly it’s a prime example for the paradox of tolerance and sooner or later people will act accordingly.
Sadly it’s a prime example for the paradox of tolerance and sooner or later people will act accordingly.
Why cling to the 2nd amendmend of the constitution and not make use of the means?
A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Highlights by me.
Instructions unclear?
I made a vegetable stock from scratch with onions, garlic, carotts, parsnip, olive oil, salt and pepper, added a potato for the texture and once done completed it with cream, sour cream, mushrooms and green peas.
Finally I added some carob gum, because it was intended to be served as sauce rather than soup.
The side order was basmati rice.
Can’t say that I was disappointed.
Which is still true if they can prove he did it.
Don’t try to make it make sense.
This never works well with propaganda.
What’s the other one? Saving a ‘t’ in the process?
Like
Billionaires need to be
taxed out of existance.
?
The percentage of ‘prepared to support’ went slightly down from 56%to 54%, which is 2 percentage points or around 4%.
The percentage of ‘not prepared to support’ went up from 36% to 41%, which is 5 percentage points or around 14%.
The numbers are still kind of unbelievable, but at least the trend points into the right direction.
Well, isn’t Trump the one who loves the poorly educated?
Although he is dumb as fuck, he understood that part.
In all honesty it can be perceived as them being next in getting their claim denied and not only as the threat it as well be perceived.
It’s so very close to Delay, Deny, Defend: Why Insurance Companies Don’t Pay Claims and What You Can Do About It that it could as well be a misunderstanding as a threat.
Was it even the majority of voters?
https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-ELECTION/RESULTS/zjpqnemxwvx/
Anyway, it still went horribly wrong.
And here I thought Luigi is just a suspect and innocent until proven guilty. But what do I know.
You’re righr. I wasn’t specific enough. I meant inflation of the supply, the currency units. Increasing the supply can cause loss of real purchase power aka inflation.
With a stable supply and only the forces of supply and demand in place, real purchase power loss or increase are possible, which means there can be inflation or deflation.
If the deregulation of cryptocurrencies happens in the US, it will get even worse except for the predators.
What about if you take out inflation and offer transactions for zero fees while operating a network with little appetite for (electric) energy?
That would mean you’d never be left with dust amounts you can’t spend and no entity could debase your holdings by issuing more currency units.
Then the price would just be the result of supply and demand.
Of course that’s not what that teenager did or what the vast majority of cryptocurrencies do, but how it could and should be done.
Speaking of the pradoxof tolerance, Karl Popper realized that intolerance often involves violence.
I, for one would argue that health insurance denying claims arbitrarily asserts violence in some way - even worse to especially vulnerable people.
So how do you imagine not tolerating this kind of intolerance?
Writing stern letters and emails? That seems to have happened.
Starting a legal battle that might be decided in your favour after you’ve died from not receiving health care due to denied claims?
What would you suggest?
Popper also draws attention to the fact that intolerance is often asserted through the use of violence […]
Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance#Proposed_solutions
If one takes beta-carotene instead of vitamin a, an existing deficiency can be resolved without introducing any risk of reaching toxic levels.