• Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    From the article…

    The Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act would also protect workers’ pay and benefits to ensure there’s no loss in pay, according to a press release.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Says nothing about loss in hours.

      Remember, when you’re paid hourly, you can lose hours and not lose pay.

      Unless the employment contract already has guaranteed hours.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Says nothing about loss in hours.

        I’m assuming that’s covered as a part of this…

        ensure there’s no loss in pay

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And you’d be wrong. Companies would still be paying them at whatever rate they were paid at. Most jobs don’t come with specifically guaranteed hours, however.

          It’s a technicality, yes, but it’s also a very important distinction. They’re not losing pay. They’re losing hours. The consequence is the same; but short of minimum wage increases; there’s no mechanism for the US Government to dictate wages to individual companies. Particularly when they were never party to that contract in the first place.