• FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The judge is in uncharted waters here, and needs to be careful to avoid anything that can be construed as evidence of bias against the defendant.

    And in so doing, hold a bias for the asshole.

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      And in so doing, hold a bias for the asshole.

      Criminal court is intended to be biased towards the defendant. Hence the “beyond a reasonable doubt” burden of proof.

      (Obviously that bias is often not upheld properly, and plenty of people are railroaded by the system into unjust convictions.)

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The court itself might be, but the judge isn’t supposed to be.

        They have procedures and guidelines, for everything involved here. Procedures and guidelines that aren’t supposed to take “ex president” into account.

        Judges aren’t supposed to allow anyone to intimidate, threaten or otherwise manipulate the witnesses or jury.

        Remember- the people of NY are one of the parties; and all parties are entitled to a fair trial.