• Poppa_Mo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Nice. I got contempt of court once and spent the weekend in jail. No ifs ands or buts about it. Judge wouldn’t even let me hand my house keys to my partner. Lol

    What a fucking joke.

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      The judge doesn’t want to give Trump’s team any ammunition for an appeal. I realize it’s absurd, but if he’s thrown in jail without significant warning then they’ll argue it biased the already liberal jury (cause NYC) against him too much.

      (I am not a lawyer, that’s just my understanding.)

      • baru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        The judge doesn’t want to give Trump’s team any ammunition for an appeal.

        It’s still treating Trump different than most. If it’s such a problem to put Trump in jail, why isn’t it for any random person?

        • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          38
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s still treating Trump different than most.

          Of course it is.

          If it’s such a problem to put Trump in jail, why isn’t it for any random person?

          Because he is a former president of the United States who is currently running for re-election. This situation is unique in American history. As much as we may dislike these facts, they are true. The judge is in uncharted waters here, and needs to be careful to avoid anything that can be construed as evidence of bias against the defendant. This trial will be under scrutiny for as long as we have a country.

          It’s not fair that most defendants do not have the essentially limitless resources of the entire conservative political machine at their disposal to pay for their legal woes, but it is the reality of the situation.

          • Zron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            11 months ago

            I would make a terrible judge, because I don’t see how this is uncharted territory. Sure, it’s unprecedented, but that doesn’t mean we don’t know what to do.

            Our entire government is made up of citizens, that was the whole point in fighting a war to get rid of an unjust monarchy, ruling from afar.

            Trump is a citizen, if he broke the law he needs to go to jail. If he breaks the law during the trial, he should receive the same punishment as any other citizen would. Doing anything else just means we have a 2 tier justice system.

            The fact that he has fucked up 10 times and is still a free man is ridiculous. All the judge has done is show trump that he can do whatever he wants and face no repercussions. If you did something 10 times, and then someone gets mad the 11th, you wouldn’t say “sorry my bad” you’d say “why are you mad, I do this all the time”

            This country is a joke

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            The judge is in uncharted waters here, and needs to be careful to avoid anything that can be construed as evidence of bias against the defendant.

            And in so doing, hold a bias for the asshole.

            • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              And in so doing, hold a bias for the asshole.

              Criminal court is intended to be biased towards the defendant. Hence the “beyond a reasonable doubt” burden of proof.

              (Obviously that bias is often not upheld properly, and plenty of people are railroaded by the system into unjust convictions.)

              • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                The court itself might be, but the judge isn’t supposed to be.

                They have procedures and guidelines, for everything involved here. Procedures and guidelines that aren’t supposed to take “ex president” into account.

                Judges aren’t supposed to allow anyone to intimidate, threaten or otherwise manipulate the witnesses or jury.

                Remember- the people of NY are one of the parties; and all parties are entitled to a fair trial.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        The judge doesn’t want to give Trump’s team any ammunition for an appeal.

        If you believe this shit, you’re fooling yourself. Guy’s gotten ten warnings when any off-the-street plaintiff would be lucky to get one. Not only will there be ammo for appeal, Merchan is building precedent of untouchability. My man is straight up announcing

        The last thing I want to do is put you in jail.

        I-fucking-magine this getting said during any other trial. How much more biased can a judge get?

        • Furbag@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Guy’s gotten ten warnings

          Playing Devil’s Advocate here, but nine of those were all reviewed at the same time, and while the decision to group them all together and issue a final warning was pending, the tenth violation was committed. Technically, and this is a really big fuckin’ technically, he has not committed any violations since being put “on notice” that the monetary punishments are over and the jail time would start. They decided on one today that occurred before that decision, so they’re not holding it to the same standard.

          I do believe the next violation will carry jail time, without a doubt. Trump has also mostly shut up since being put on notice as well because he doesn’t want to be put in a cell any more than you or I do.

          But it is extremely, maddeningly frustrating that Trump has gotten away with it so far. The Judge’s decision today proves beyond a doubt that the law is not being equally applied in favor of Trump himself.

          Honestly, I don’t know if I could be an impartial judge in this case, because knowing Trump I would have warned him the very second he stepped foot in the courtroom that he was already on notice and that he should expect jail time if even a single word escaped his mouth that is in violation of the gag order that was already in place. Maybe Judge Merchan is more magnanimous, more cool-headed, or simply too wary of the blowback from applying the law equally with a megalomaniac like Trump who has an army of idiots at his back. I don’t know. All I know is, I don’t think he’s out of line just yet, but hearing statements like “I don’t want to put you in jail” for a guy who is too rich for fines to have an impact on is not reassuring.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think 11 contempt charges represents 10 more “significant warnings” than anyone else would get.

        I legitimate appeals court would accept trumps argument and illegitimate courts aren’t going to care and just side with Trump anyhow.

        This isn’t for appeals… it’s for mass consumption; and it’s a massive miscarriage of justice.

      • guldukat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Hitler got a slap on the wrist because the judge was sympathetic. Same story here.

  • adam_y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Wow, he must have really learned his lesson from the last 9 telling offs.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Threatening him does nothing but make the judge look like a chickenshit same as the rest

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      “The last thing I want to do is put you in jail.”

      ~ Judge Juan Merchan

      We love our fair and impartial judiciary, don’t we folks? Lets give Judge Merchan a big hand. He’s helping to Make America Great Again.

      • drislands@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        11 months ago

        I wonder if he means that in the sense of “putting you in jail is only going to empower your frankly rabid base of supporters. I need to avoid even the slightest hint of a mistrial so we can put you in prison for good.”

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          putting you in jail is only going to empower your frankly rabid base of supporters

          What does the judge think will happen should the jury returns a guilty verdict?

  • KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    When does this raise questions of precedent? Is everyone entitled to 10 violations of a gag order in NYC now?

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Wheres all those people that were telling me he’d be jailed with the next contempt charge?

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    If the jail time is on par with the fines he gets, he should spend about five minutes in jail. That should teach him not to do it again.

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The judge seems to have a kink for holding Trump in contempt based on how ineffective the admonitions have been.