return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoForcing workers back to the office could be terrible for the environmentwww.motherjones.comexternal-linkmessage-square24linkfedilinkarrow-up1240arrow-down111
arrow-up1229arrow-down1external-linkForcing workers back to the office could be terrible for the environmentwww.motherjones.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square24linkfedilink
minus-squareVaquedoso@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkarrow-up43arrow-down3·1 year agoWho cares about the environment when we could be hoarding more money. Can anybody please think about those poor CEOs? :(
minus-squareAltofaltception@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·edit-21 year agoCEOs can make more money by offloading office costs to the employee - if your work force is remote, you don’t need to pay for an office space. This increases your profit, because your expenses are lower.
minus-squarekrashmo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up21·1 year agoBut you can’t invest all that stolen money in inflated office building real estate prices either.
Who cares about the environment when we could be hoarding more money. Can anybody please think about those poor CEOs? :(
CEOs can make more money by offloading office costs to the employee - if your work force is remote, you don’t need to pay for an office space.
This increases your profit, because your expenses are lower.
But you can’t invest all that stolen money in inflated office building real estate prices either.