jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 11 months ago“CSAM generated by AI is still CSAM,” DOJ says after rare arrestarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square38linkfedilinkarrow-up1193arrow-down16
arrow-up1187arrow-down1external-link“CSAM generated by AI is still CSAM,” DOJ says after rare arrestarstechnica.comjeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 11 months agomessage-square38linkfedilink
minus-squareover_clox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down28·11 months agoThen we should be able to charge AI (the developers moreso) for the same disgusting crime, and shut AI down.
minus-squarejeffw@lemmy.worldOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down1·11 months agoI think that’s a bit of a stretch. If it was being marketed as “make your fantasy, no matter how illegal it is,” then yeah. But just because I use a tool someone else made doesn’t mean they should be held liable.
minus-squareover_clox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down6·11 months agoCheck my other comments. My thought was compared to a hammer. Hammers aren’t trained to act or respond on their own from millions of user inputs.
minus-squarejeffw@lemmy.worldOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoI learned how to write by reading. The AI did the same, more or less, no?
minus-squareover_clox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·11 months agoThe AI didn’t learn to draw or generate photos from blind words though…
minus-squarejeffw@lemmy.worldOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoOh, it learned from art? Like how human artists learn?
minus-squareover_clox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·11 months agoAI hasn’t exactly kicked out a Picasso with a naked young girl missing an ear yet has it? I sure hope not! But if it can, then that seriously indicates it must have some bad training data in the system… I won’t be testing these hypotheses.
minus-squareover_clox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·11 months agoI’d rather not fart bullets, but thank you for inviting me to the party.
minus-squareover_clox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoTotally dismissing inappropriate usage, AI can be funny and entertaining, but on the flip side it’s also taking people’s jobs. It shouldn’t take a book, let alone 3 seconds of common sense thought, to realize that.
Then we should be able to charge AI (the developers moreso) for the same disgusting crime, and shut AI down.
I think that’s a bit of a stretch. If it was being marketed as “make your fantasy, no matter how illegal it is,” then yeah. But just because I use a tool someone else made doesn’t mean they should be held liable.
Check my other comments. My thought was compared to a hammer.
Hammers aren’t trained to act or respond on their own from millions of user inputs.
I learned how to write by reading. The AI did the same, more or less, no?
The AI didn’t learn to draw or generate photos from blind words though…
Oh, it learned from art? Like how human artists learn?
AI hasn’t exactly kicked out a Picasso with a naked young girl missing an ear yet has it?
I sure hope not!
But if it can, then that seriously indicates it must have some bad training data in the system…
I won’t be testing these hypotheses.
Can we do guns next?
I’d rather not fart bullets, but thank you for inviting me to the party.
deleted by creator
Totally dismissing inappropriate usage, AI can be funny and entertaining, but on the flip side it’s also taking people’s jobs.
It shouldn’t take a book, let alone 3 seconds of common sense thought, to realize that.