Judge Aileen Cannon is considering tossing out the notes as evidence.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    11 months ago

    Proof he knew what he was doing was wrong and his arguments that he declassified them all are bullshit.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      Those arguments were always bullshit. He never went through the process of declassifying them. We also already know that he bragged to a reporter that he had classified documents. So he knew he had them, he knew he should not, and he knew he would get in legal trouble if he gave them back.

    • Brokkr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      It is my understanding that the statues that he’s being charged under do not depend on the classification of the documents. The problem is that the documents belonged to the government and were not returned upon multiple requests. Therefore, even if the documents were declassified, which they were not, the same charges could still be brought against him.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Agreed, what I’m saying is these notes apply to state of mind. He knew he was acting illegally and did it anyway.

  • resetbypeer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    I wonder who is still surprised by all this. Convicted felon who wants to play the dictator with a projection of a space Laser…

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Judge Aileen Cannon is considering tossing out the notes as evidence.

    It says a lot about her that it’s not immediately apparent whether or not that’s a joke inventing comically blatant corruption or something she’s actually considering 😮‍💨🤦

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Can anybody with actual knowledge of law explain why the prosecutors should be allowed to use Trump’s lawyer’s notes against Trump in this case? Seems like it would make sense that it isn’t allowed.