• doingthestuff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    I am a huge police accountability buff. But also, law matters, and court rulings matter. If police order you out of your car for their safety (in the US), you have to comply. If you do not, they are authorized to use force to pull you out and almost never do that gently. Cops absolutely use excessive force all the time, so not doing things that specifically give them permission would be smart. Him rolling up his tinted windows and refusing to get out of the car are what made this happen.

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Maybe, and I’m just spitballing here, but maybe for a simple speeding offense they didn’t need to drag him out of the car? Just because they are allowed to based on past court cases doesn’t mean they should use that for every issue they see.

      • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        There are a lot of people who want to end qualified immunity and reform many realities of policing today. I am describing the reality today. There’s a reason I say I’m interested in police accountability/transparency.

    • crusty_baboon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The time between them ordering him out of the car (not asking to roll down the window) and them forcing him out was a few seconds.

      • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The one I saw was longer, they knocked at least two different times and he kept telling them off.

        • crusty_baboon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          But they didn’t tell him to get out of the car yet. He should have rolled down the window yes, but that’s a separate issue than Penn vs Mimms.

          • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Sure, but once they establish a pattern of non-compliance it doesn’t reset with each new instruction. They expect he will resist getting out of the car based on his refusal to roll down the window. At that point they have to choose whether to get him out of the car quickly, or risk non-compliance issue with that, which could involve fleeing or hitting people with his car.

            When officer or public safety are at risk they will always choose to take someone into custody to stabilize the situation and then reassess from there.

            The situation with the window can’t be separated from the treatment with the door.

      • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The clip I saw at the link looked like it was edited right there, I’d love to see the raw video. It could have been too quick, it could have been longer. I don’t know.