The FCC is still taking comments from the public about how much data you really use and what your experience with data caps is like.

The Federal Communications Commission is officially looking into broadband data caps and their impact on consumers. On Tuesday, the FCC approved a notice of inquiry to examine whether data caps harm consumers and competition, as well as why data caps persist “despite increased broadband needs” and the “technical ability to offer unlimited data plans,” as spotted earlier by Engadget.

Many internet plans come with a data cap that limits how much bandwidth you can use each month. If you go over the data cap, internet service providers will typically charge an extra fee or slow down your service. The FCC first started inviting consumers to comment on broadband data caps last June, hundreds of which you can now read on the agency’s website.

You can still share your experience with broadband data caps with the FCC through this form, which will ask for details about the name of your ISP, usage limits, and any challenges you’ve encountered due to the cap.

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    They exist so that companies can extract additional dollars from each data line.

  • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Money.

    When something isn’t about money or power, then you can actually phrase it like it’s a surprise.

  • Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    6 months ago

    and why they still exist

    Does that really require inquiry? It’s for more money, fucking obviously.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 months ago

    I want to know why upstream bandwidth is so limited too. I have about 300gb of data at home, not much at all by hoarder standards. But there is no decent way for me to back it up to a remote server, because of low upload speed.

    • bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      On cable it’s because they allocate significantly more bandwidth towards download than upload. They could allocate them equally but most customers that are mostly just streaming or playing games care only about the download since it means they can stream/download things faster.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          And only in the past couple years have we been hitting that limit. Maintaining backwards compliance has been more important for cable service. Anyone who had a real need would have used T-carrier service, fiber, or multiple bonded lines, depending on year and budget.

  • Dagnet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    Internet providers tried to implement data caps in my country but it got shot down, its sad you guys have to put up with that nonsense

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    The caps don’t go up either, even though shit uses more data. Xfinity has been at ~1TB forever despite that fact that 4k video uses insane amounts of data now and that downloading 1 video game can easily take 300 GB.

    • GreyDawn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I remember when the ISP said that we would never need 1TB, it’s like 1 million floppies. They knew we would be here needing that data when game downloads are now 150GB+

  • HorreC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    this is being brought up from MSFS 2024, lot of nerds in planes were about to get hit with that limit and the FCC is like its time to shine!!