• ekZepp@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      If is shit, then stop consuming it. (no movies, no comics, no series, no books, NO ART)

      OR

      If is worthless then anyone can easily do it. Just create that yourself, BUT without using a program who steal and mix-up previous artworks. You don’t need that, right?

      But ofk you work for free, right?

      • Zexks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t really. I don’t go to or buy any of those. Haven’t in decades. “Artists” like to think WAAAAAAY to highly of themselves and their work.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s a fundamental difference between a person learning from other people, and machines learning from other people, because the latter can be copied infinitely. One person can only generate so much output, while the machine can be scaled horizontally.

      • Zexks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Irrelevant Human exceptionalism. Just because something is copyable doesn’t inherently make it worse. Just as something being difficult to obtain doesn’t make it inherently better.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          “Irrelevant human exceptionalism”? Sorry I don’t want creatives to starve while a few rich people get ever richer.

      • Zexks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        No. They create derivations of content they consumed prior. Most of them will even post their “inspirations” along with their derivations. And no one gives a shit.