• DrFistington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Throw his body into the pit with the MAGAts then cover it with a few metric tons of dirt and wait for the muffled screams to die down

  • the_fuzz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have no love for Schumer and would love to see him replaced, but to play devil’s advocate for a sec, isn’t shutting down the government what Trump and his cronies want? Say the government does shut down, what would prevent Republicans just leaving it shut down indefinitely until all the furloughed employees quit (the same people they’ve been trying to fire unsuccessfully)? Or passing bills to selectively fund only the programs they like while leaving the Dept of Education and others unfunded?

    • Ernest@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      because in the long medium term sooner than I imagine, those things are going to happen anyway. Presenting it as a choice between “saving (some) fed employees” vs “fucking them over” is disingenuous. The actual choice is between “ceding power and the news narrative” vs not. People are upset that the Dems keep doing this, despite the long history of “working across the aisle” not working.

      To address your specific points: just because there are things the Republicans want, doesn’t mean they’re “good” for them (see: all? of their policies). In the case of federal employees, passing the “CR”* isn’t going to get them paid–the GOP doesn’t care what the laws say (obviously). The Dems should be obstructing other ridiculous funding bills as well, because the only thing they can do is be in the news cycle for obstruction (and then using that time to sell progressive policies that most people agree with). That’s the only leverage they have. This appeasement threw that away. The hive of scum and villainy is only going to continue their illegal cuts, and the correct response is to fight back, not to lend them more legitimacy. Dems have tried that for decades and this is what it’s gotten us.

      *: it’s not really a “continuing” resolution, as it has a bunch of Trumpian garbage in it that wasn’t in the previous appropriations bill. They’re just… calling it that, and Senate Dems have tacitly endorsed it as such.

    • Bristingr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Trump could have simply done that by just not signing the bill and get his shutdown.