• iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    7 days ago

    Why is it in our interest to pay for food that causes obesity and health issues?

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 days ago

      I want you to consider what you would do if you had $300 per month to buy food. How often would you use any of that money to buy soda and candy? Would you do it on a regular? Or would you do it just for special occasions to lift your spirits when things were bad?

      This isn’t about health this is about punishing the poor for being poor.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I would buy it literally never, because I already never buy it, because I know it makes me fat and depressed.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        I would spend very little of it on candy and soda, but not every person makes the same choices

        • futatorius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          I was very poor for two or three years in my early 20s. I was maniacally disciplined in only buying healthy, affordable food, no alcohol, no junk food, no sweets. Brown rice, beans, fish off the boat (a fishing fleet operated from our city’s harbor), tofu, miso, green veg. So I stayed healthy. If I had received any assistance, interference in my choices wouldn’t have helped. But the purpose of the interference isn’t to help, it’s to disempower, infantilize and humiliate.

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            It wouldn’t interfere in your choices because you didn’t buy those things

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            If I’m paying for it, I have the right to vote for this law. It affects me

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          So you agree that there is some amount of acceptable spending on sweets.

    • Archangel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Why do you consider what someone else eats to be a matter of “your interest”, at all?

      Do you think your boss…who pays your salary…should be allowed to dictate what you spend it on? Is it in “their interest” to make sure you’re spending their money on “the right things”?

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Do you think your boss…who pays your salary…should be allowed to dictate what you spend it on?

        Historically, that was a thing until very recently. Henry Ford used to send inspectors into people’s homes to snoop on them, not only food and alcohol, but what language they spoke in the home. Thank the unions for that bullshit having been stopped.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        If I’m paying for it, it’s my interest. If it’s your personal decision, then do what you want

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Then start with ag subsidies. But that’s if you’re serious about fixing the problem and don’t just want to punish poor people for being poor.