• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    Republicans were never going to compromise.

    So why not have taken a position which is actually defensible, like abolishing ICE/ DHS, instead of the reform position, which is actually indefensible.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because democrats negotiate before they get to the table.

      How else could they frame capitulation as compromise?

    • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because Israel and the billionaires who doneate to establishment Dems want a fascist USA, and are ordering them to not actually resist.

  • Doug Holland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Uh, color me ever-so-slightly skeptical that even a brief DHS shutdown is even remotely possible, when both parties so enthusiastically support the status quo.

  • villainy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I wonder how many ICE fucks know they’re supposed to work without pay while DHS is unfunded? The worst of the worst are literally just there to hurt people so they’ll happily stick around. Will enough resign to make it “unsafe” for the remainder to continue operating?

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The ICE guys still get paid:

      While there is some FY2026 funding for ICE, the agency received a $75 billion infusion of funding over the next decade through the already-passed “Big Beautiful Bill,” so a lapse in funding at DHS would not cease operations there.

      Even if this funding doesn’t show up, ICE will still have more funds than the FBI.