• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Look closer. Those are 5.25" floppies, which never had the popularity as save icons that 3.5" floppies did.

    • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Heh. I’ve had this thought many times, that we used the floppy as a save icon for longer than we even used the damn floppy, and for almost that whole time, there were tons of people coming online who’d never used floppies and would get no help whatsoever from that icon.

      Recently I notice that the bookmark has become the metaphor for “save.” Literally an icon showing the end of a bookmark hanging forward. But is this actually an improvement? Does anyone fucking read books anymore??

  • Alberat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    their peoples used storage devices they called “floppies” yet they were rigid squares. no one is certain of the origin of this term and the leading theory is that the squares simply calcified over time.

    • Mickey7@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      funny. That’s exactly how archeology works. They try to fit the logic and customs of today into what people actually did in the past

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Being in a museum doesn’t make it ancient. Moma had the iPod and iMac on display when those things were like 5-10 years old.

    • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      My local science museum had a laptop from the '90s on display, with the caption “computing in the 1900s”. My kids asked if that was what I had in school when I was their age, and I had to break the news to them that I was already done with school when those were current…

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        This trend of saying 1900s for the end of that century seems intentionally aging to me. That was 26 years ago. I feel like even at 50 years it is a little odd to start using that term. I feel like it implies it was at least close to 100 years ago