“Since the quality of AI deception and the ways you can do it keeps improving and shifting this is an important element to keep the policy dynamic as AI and usage gets more pervasive or more deceptive, or people get more accustomed to it,” Mr Gregory said.
He added focusing on labelling fake posts would be an effective solution for some content, such as videos which have been recycled or recirculated from a previous event, but he was sceptical about the effectiveness of automatically labelling content manipulated using emerging AI tools.
Are there any social scientists on lemmy? Have we actually studied the effects of labeling misinformation as opposed to removing it? Does labeling misinformation actually stop it from spreading and being believed, or does it reinforce conspiratorial thinking? This is not a rhetorical question - I genuinely don’t know.
.
Okay.
Someone do one on Zuckerberg and get it on the platform! Pronto!
Democrats always lose because they fight with one arm behind their back while the Republicans use fire.
Meta is not going to do the right thing. Fight fire with fire and make deepfakes of Trump too and all his ilk
Doesn’t even need to be deepfakes. They’re already that awful,
Yeah, you can show Maga morons actual videos of Trump committing crimes or admitting to them, and rhey will brush it off. Comedians have been doing this for a while at rallies. It’s not so funny lately, since they’re winning in current polls.
Fuck polls.
No, let’s pay attention to them, and vote like it matters.
Polls indicate that Democrats need to move left in order to win. Democrats would rather lose.
This is probably the stupidest take I’ve seen.
I agree that dems, quite often, well…do things like absolute pussies. But…deep fakes are not the answer.
I agree with the first sentence, not so much the second part. The apathy and lack of fight in Biden’s campaign sucks, it’s like the democrats are defending the title but bringing a pillow to the boxing ring.
