Your comment will age poorly when Trump’s tarrifs lead to a collapsing economy and he prints money like mad to solve it, resulting in hyper-inflation letting President Musk keep his election promise.

The only rule; first to shit themselves loses

Article requires sign up which Im not willing to do.

Also didn’t receive a GDPR compliant prompt.

I did say a country that can fight back. Moldova and Georgia aren’t going to align themselves with NATO and won’t receive the funding and arms that Ukraine has.

People talking about Poland being next are delusional.

It will take another 20-30 years before the Russians recover enough from their current losses to even start considering attacking a neighbouring country that can fight back.

From the article you linked

it also provides a worrying forecast of what could happen if the situation is prolonged

Do you understand what a forecast is?

On the other hand, “mortality among children aged under one year old was 8.4 in 2022 – one of the lowest values in recorded history,” said the observatory. “However, it has remained stagnant at this value over the last few years, between 2018 and 2022.”

Your claim is unsubstantiated but plausible.

There is as yet no evidence of increased child mortality (yet) and seeking to paint those you disagree with as child killing monsters and ignoring the longer term benefits of a stronger economy, reduced poverty and by your own claims, reduced child mortality is naive at best.

Long term fixing the Argentinian economy would result in better quality of life and reduced child mortality.

Allowing high inflation to continue would prevent that progress and long term result in more dead children.

Nice straw man. I never made that claim. I simply asked you to explain why you think inflation is better for the poor than the current situation, which you have clearly expressed you do.

I will, right after you answer how uncontrolled inflation helps poor people.

Repeated your unsourced claim that people are dying does not make it true, and nice dodging the question.

You honestly believe high inflation is better for poor people?

New chess grandmaster strat just dropped

My school’s bus, which was used only for sporting events and trips, was an actual prison bus. It still had restraint attachment points and the bars on the windows.

It was brilliant for psyching out the other football teams.

A wireless controller as well and no backup.

I wonder if they even had spare batteries.

Good. I like it when prey fights back.

Person wants to join the bastards, is shocked to be abused by bastards.

Your concept of middle class, wealth and finances are in question because you have repeatedly claimed that owning a $140k yacht makes you wealthy and excludes you from the middle class.

$140k is a lot of money for most people but for someone that is middle class, ie their disposable income is 30% of their income, it is potentially affordable.

Someone making $150k/year is potentially middle class, depending on their housing and living costs. If that person can put 30% of their post tax income towards an interest like yachting they could easily afford a $140k yacht.

Like I said, your understanding of wealth is lacking.

You think a skilled working couple can’t accrue a couple million in assets over their working life?

Well that explains a lot. You’re bad with money.

Luxury cars are defined solely for taxation purposes.

Having a couple of million in assets is still middle class. A union worker can build that sort of wealth over a lifetime.

You probably aren’t middle class given your limited views on some rather modest assets.

I think there’s enough room in middle class for someone to own a small yacht.

You seem to think middle class means poverty and near homelessness.

Yea no one in the middle class can afford a house, a couple of cars and a small yacht.

It’s impossible without having billions in the bank!