Three raccoons in a trench coat. I talk politics and furries.
Other socials: https://ragdollx.carrd.co/
Guns brought in through the border, toxic waste infecting the population, and now Trump wants to start a trade war with Mexico and other countries…
Frankly I wouldn’t be surprised if the US was responsible for like half of Mexico’s problems.
America will get there.
Add another right-wing extremist to the ever-growing pile:
https://www.start.umd.edu/data-tools/profiles-individual-radicalization-united-states-pirus
Eh, I’ll continue enjoying my yiff there. Once most of the artists & content creators I follow move to Bluesky I probably won’t have any reason to stick to Twitter though.
Frankly at this point it’s a moral necessity
led by British media personality Andrew Doyle
The course’s reading list includes Doyle’s own books
So this is just state-sanctioned propaganda from some random guy
Maybe they should pay the crazy dude in the street corner who’s shouting about the end of the world to give a course as well
I wonder if Doyle is even going to give an actual definition of the term ‘woke’
Honestly I’m not surprised considering California politicians seem to have a knack for making money disappear into thin air with magic (corruption): https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/gavin-newsom-homeless-money-budget-b2544347.html
Despite what the law might say, there’s no evidence whatsoever that letting trans people use their preferred bathroom causes any “injury or harm” to cis people.
To the contrary, there is evidence that restricting bathroom access is harmful to trans people - and cis people too, like Jay, a cis woman who was harassed in a bathroom after being mistaken for a trans person.
Even if they use the “right” restroom trans people are in danger of being harassed all the same if they pass too well: https://www.advocate.com/news/2022/7/12/trans-man-brutally-assaulted-using-womens-restroom-campground
Damned if you do, and damned if you don’t. The point of laws like this isn’t to protect cis women and girls, it’s just to cause as much suffering as possible, because that’s all Republicans care about.
Zero surprises there. So many gun nuts are just itching to kill someone, and to those who were paying any attention it was abundantly obvious that’s exactly the kind of person who Rittenhouse is considering his fake crying, taking pictures with the judge, as well as buddying up to nazis and literally making a game to celebrate his shooting.
They’re probably mostly part of the ~8% of Democrats who lean conservative according to Pew’s political typology.
The thing that all the experts and everyone who’s informed on this topic said was going to happen ended up happening? I’m so surprised! 😱
Republicans want more teen pregnancy? I’m so (un)surprised!
deleted by creator
Oh SatansMaggotyCumFart, your comments never disappoint.
You’d be surprised at just how little the average voter knows about politics. There’s a reason a lot of people wish politics would go back to being boring and not something everyone talked about.
There’s a well-known relationship between abortion restrictions and worse health outcomes for women and children.
I’ve also read harrowing accounts from women who resorted to infanticide because they couldn’t get an abortion. While I couldn’t find the specific anecdotes I’d seen before, I found that the Wikipedia page on this topic has plenty of info showing that access to safe abortions does reduce infanticide.
Ȉ̶̢̠̳͉̹̫͎̻͔̫̈́͊̑͐̃̄̓̊͘ ̶̨͈̟̤͈̫̖̪̋̾̓̀̓͊̀̈̓̀̕̚̕͘͝Ạ̶̢̻͉̙̤̫̖̦̼̜̙̳̐́̍̉́͒̓̀̆̎̔͋̏̕͝͝M̶̛̛͇̔̀̈̄̀́̃̅̆̈́͑̑͆̇ ̵̢̨͈̭͇̙̲͎͉̝͙̻̌͝I̷̡͓͖̙̩̟̫̝̼̝̪̟̔͑͒͊͑̈́̀̿̋͂̓̋̔͌̚ͅN̸̮̞̟̰̣͙̦̲̥̠͑̔̎͑̇͜͝ ̷̢̛̛͍̞̖̹̮͈͕̠̟̽̔̋̎͋͑̍̿̅̈́̋̕̚̚͜͝Y̴̧̨̨͙̗̩̻̹̦̻͎͇͈͎͓̩̐̓Ö̸͈̭̒̌̀̇͂̃͠ͅŨ̷̢̞̗͛̌͌͒̀̇́̽̓͑͝Ŕ̷͇͌ ̸̛̮̋̏̋̋̔͝W̶͔̄̐͋͑A̷̧̖̗͕̻̳͙̼͖͒L̴̩̰͙̾͑͑͑̒̏Ḻ̸̡̦̭͚̱̝̟̣̤͗̊́͐̋̈́̒͠͠͠͠͝S̸̯͚͈̠͍̆̉̑͗͊̄̒̏͆̔͊
If only you were equally displeased by reactionary rhetoric from the left…
*black men