Despite what the law might say, there’s no evidence whatsoever that letting trans people use their preferred bathroom causes any “injury or harm” to cis people.
To the contrary, there is evidence that restricting bathroom access is harmful to trans people - and cis people too, like Jay, a cis woman who was harassed in a bathroom after being mistaken for a trans person.
Even if they use the “right” restroom trans people are in danger of being harassed all the same if they pass too well: https://www.advocate.com/news/2022/7/12/trans-man-brutally-assaulted-using-womens-restroom-campground
Damned if you do, and damned if you don’t. The point of laws like this isn’t to protect cis women and girls, it’s just to cause as much suffering as possible, because that’s all Republicans care about.
Trans identity supersedes all law, or medical context, or any other bullshit justification for dehumanizing anyone experiencing any form of Gender Dysphoria.
You as a person reading this have value. Just by your very sentience you have worth. You are loved.
We will overcome this moment in our history eventually, we may not all live to see it happen but we will. I know that’s an atom of relief in a sea of pain. Don’t let this bullshit dim your shine.
I love each and every one of you.
Pop Quiz:
Which bathroom should he use?
As long as it’s not my stall, I don’t care
He can use mine
Pssshhhhh!!! Look at this bourgeoisie mother fucker over here, refusing to share their stall with others!
Selfish. Yes, that’s the word!
The common working man poops on the left half of the toilet, and a stranger from the streets poop on the right half! AND THEY BOTH HATE THE YANKEES!!!
Because fuck the Yankees. Can’t believe I have to cheer for the god damn Dodgers …
I’ve done things like this when people do the ‘trans women make “real” women feel uncomfortable in locker rooms’ argument.
“So you’re saying women would be more comfortable with that guy changing next to them?”
They don’t really have an argument against that part.
“Oh, she’s just a tomboy, the phase will pass.”
That’s OBVIOUSLY a Woman and should use my Daughter’s Bathroom!
Depends on the state.
Here is the names and photo of the Odessa city council.
https://www.odessa-tx.gov/670/City-Council
Here is the mayor.
https://www.odessa-tx.gov/Directory.aspx?EID=112
I think it’s definitely worth observing the city hall restrooms in case they are using the one that doesn’t fit their gender so you can collect that bounty.
And remember, you don’t have to make sure, you know one when you see one.
Each and every one of those fuckers looks like they’re in a retail store about to demand to speak to someone’s manager.
Johnathan Gooch, communications director for Equality Texas, told the Texas Tribune, “It’s a very aggressive way to alienate trans people from public life, and I think it is counter to the spirit of friendship that most Texans embody.”
Spirit of friendship? Bitch, ya’ll threaten to secede every other year.
I do get the sentiment, although for the opposite reasons that they have.
Cool, they got a useless law to “protect” children. Where is the law that protects them in churches/camps/etc?
Why would they do that? These laws are there to convince ma and pa dipshit that child predators are trans people not a group that’s not open or openly or formally organized and consists of people in all strata of society. In short these laws are to protect the pedos in power from suspicion
is there an easy way for us to abuse this system to get ourselves paid a bunch of money?
deleted by creator
I don’t want to post the “Da Fuck ya doing over there”-meme again. But what the hell.
what a stupid fucking country
Can someone explain what this headline was supposed to say? The grammar is… Confusing.
And high fives from everybody for the heads of the people who put up the bounty!
It’s Halloween time. Could be some easy money to be made
A bounty on trans people? So I get paid by the state to catch 'em and turn 'em in so they can be issued their ‘up to $500 fine’? How cost ineffective.
Ah, it’s misinformation and done so poorly, in an attempt to dramatise, they used the wrong word.
So, the $10,000 is actually for lawsuits and can start there if anyone found guilty of the crime had also caused damages. That’s very normal for laws of people being somewhere they’ve been told not to be and damaging stuff. Like if I break the toilet seat I’m standing on while peering over the top of the cubicle to watch you pee.
It’s articles like this that do not help a cause at all.
It can only be assumed this works in favour of anyone on that 5-2 vote that doesn’t like trans people. If that’s the case then it should be attacking gender identity issues for bathroom use, not trespass laws started in 1989 using binaries. (Yes, in an effort to get the actual information, I read other actual news articles)
Are you willfully ignorant or do you not understand how Jim Crow laws work?
The 10k is the statuatory minimum and its paid from the person just trying to take a piss to the psychopath policing who can piss where who was not in any way damaged. It is not at all normal to pay random people out of the pockets of those breaking the law.
In this case it encourages bigots to attack trans people trying to pee by allowing them to legally rob them if they catch them.
Worse it encourages such attacks whichever bathroom they use. Dress like a girl use the womans room get attacked for using the wrong bathroom, use the mens room get attacked for being a woman in the means room.
Using the bounty as a method of enforcement exists because the law is deemed likely unlawful. It exists explicitly to stop a pre emptive lawsuit against the government to stop enforcement.
