Just another voice yelling into the void.

I’ve probably protested for your rights. I’m definitely on at least one list.

I believe firmly that everyone should have a fair shake and as much freedom as they can be afforded - so long as it does not encroach on the freedoms of others.

  • 0 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 7th, 2023

help-circle
  • So am I.

    preface: next bit will be cold and kind of awful but probable… It doesn’t thrill me but again, reality likely won’t (shouldn’t) surprise anyone.

    The event will be out of the public eye and forgotten for the next new hot tragedy that social media is pushing. Assuming schools allow any form of protests at all by then - a new wave of kids will be all grown up and looking to make their mark on society… Our current events will be, at best, a footnote reference.

    For example: what ever did happen to those Uyghurs…? (~10 years ago)

    For a change to happen it would need to be happening now. For it to be meaningful: it would require other countries to physically step in to do something about it. They aren’t. Yes the American government is providing basically satan with a blank check and infinite ammo (I’ve not checked to see if he said thank you.) But those shipments aren’t being teleported there. Other countries could absolutely act to stop this… but it would require becoming involved. (see my “just don’t want trouble” statement above)

    In the end: it’s probable that Israel will succeed in effectively wiping out a large swath of the population and we will see yet another generation of children who will seek retribution through acts of terror … and feel justified in doing so. The cycle continues.

    It is unthinkable what is going on there. It’s unthinkable what has occurred in past genocide’s. It’s uncomfortable and ugly and painful. So we tuck it away as something bad which we acknowledge… but only just enough to differentiate ourselves from ‘those monsters’ and let the moment pass. Do we deeply document our own wrongdoings and painful memories? Do we teach and discuss how to prevent such terrible things? Rarely. Because it’s uncomfortable. And so history repeats.


  • I can’t imagine someone finding out their government killed thousands of people just being okay with that.

    Unfortunately, this is reality… and reality kinda sucks.

    Pick a country. They probably participated in a genocide at some point. Here’s a question: if your country willingly participated in the elimination of a group of people … you going to be in a hurry to try to stop them? Very few people do.

    Very few people do.

    Reality is most will avoid the conflict as it doesn’t directly effect them … and “they don’t want any trouble.” You needn’t look far or very hard to find out how quickly being a dissenting voice can become collateral damage.

    Now I need to be clear: I’m not saying fall in line and keep your head down… but I’m also not so foolish as to think that history will fondly remember the names of those who didn’t.







  • For the afflicted? No.

    For us as a species? No.

    For capitalism? God yes.

    Thin people consume the least. Once we stop growing we stop needing new clothes. Obesity changes this. Clothes wear out faster, you need new sizes. Obesity leads to depressive states where people buy more to feel better. Speaking of more: eat more! Have some sweets to feel better!

    Be bold. Be beautiful. Be you (for us!)

    Clothing stores and food chains done with you? Guess you are broken now…

    Welcome to the medical system you will now need to rely on to function and stay alive! Till death do we part.

    Obesity is an epidemic and it’s too profitable to actually do anything about. They don’t care about you, your feelings, or your health. You are literally livestock to these corporations that you think are caudling you and your way of life. This is a wake up call.

    Obesity is difficult to conquer. It requires change and persistence. It requires support. Not everyone can achieve a ‘healthy ideal’ but everyone can do better.



  • As I asserted earlier - you are heavily downplaying the efforts of someone working in the same field for the same amount of time and treating it differently. That simply isn’t a fair assessment and is being used to sell a statement that is a half truth. Both individuals have something to show for their time investment that highlights their value. One has a degree which, for the reasons you have specified, is valuable - one has 4 years of experience in the field highlighting they are competent enough and skilled enough to be an asset to the same company for 4 years. To head off the followup: does every worker at a job have 100% “hire this man” energy? Certainly not. Conversely does every graduate have what it takes to succeed in a field? Absolutely not. With that in mind both individuals applying to a new job with the aforementioned experience/degree will, and should be, weighted similarly.

    With regard to your electrician example: a licensed electrician is just that. When you hire one do you care if he got a degree in EE prior to getting his license? The result is what matters. This is the point I keep driving at. If I hire a lawyer, I could care less what is hanging on his office wall - I care that he passed the bar and wins consistently. There are many paths to the same result… don’t simply scorn one because it is a path you wouldn’t take.



  • I see this point used frequently - and it isn’t wrong … but it’s only half of a statement. In that time let’s say someone holds a position for 4 years of experience. These two things are not equally weighted, but very similar at that point. As time progresses that piece of paper continues to lose value when compared to experience in the field.

    The degree is, in essence, a signal that someone has achieved at least the base level of competency in a field and stuck with it for x time. So assuming 2 parties with 0 work experience vie for a job naturally the degree holder will win out. It gets murkier when comparing someone with 4 years with in field experience to a 4 year degree holder with 0 experience.

    The point I aimed to make was just that. It’s a perfectly reasonable assertion.




  • That sounds like a rough experience friend, but if I was working at a company that needed to check up on my documentation after working there for some time - I’d probably find a new job where I wasn’t just employee 253966.

    To your point about names carrying their weight - that’s a problem in itself: what about those that don’t go to ivy league? What about those that do that simply lack any marketable skill outside of where they went?

    I agree that the interview process at a lot of aforementioned places is particularly awful. Once working there it typically doesn’t improve. The facilities are nice enough, sure… but I’ve seen far too many people working for companies like that get laid off regardless of how performant they were. They are just a line item.

    The point I made initially was that many jobs do not require the degree to do the work. Many professions do not benefit from a 4 year college building a curriculum around now outdated information.

    There are good companies and good professions that do not have those requirements.