• HarriPotero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It think they drew the wrong conclusions.

    It’s not the high income-countries that are spearheading this decrease. It’s the high cost of living-countries.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s been observed for something like 70 years, across all sorts of other economic trends. I’ve heard before that the peak human population is expected to be about 11 billion and change, in a century or so, and then it will likely just hang there.

  • Vej@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My wife and I work a total of 4 main jobs. I think we had 10+ total forms of income for 2023.I try to get money on the side too. I can’t afford a kid. Even if I could, what time would I have to be a parent?

    My in laws want us to pop out kids. We live in a 1br place. And we are just barely keeping our heads above water. They will say stuff like “well if you wait for a perfect time there will never be one,” or saying it’s our duty to let them have grandkids.

    Linux is great.

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    One of the things that drives economic growth - which is required under capitalism - is the growth of families. Lots of things anticipate having more people alive in the future to drive demand and provide labor. If that’s not going to be the case, what will happen to companies that demand constant growth?

    Even if it’s just infant and child care that level off, that’s a huge part of our economy not growing. And our economy requires growth.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think this is good or bad. If it’s voluntary, fine. We’re not in some Children of Men style crisis just because people are having fewer kids, the human race will survive for a long time at 1.7 kids per woman or whatever, and rates will not be the same in 500 years for all sorts of reasons.

    The concern is that it’s something like microplastics or birth control washing into waterways causing lesser fertility, but if it’s something like that we can focus on fixing that specifically and rates will go back up.

  • saaquin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I personally love my kid. I was so excited to be a parent. I am so surprised everyone is kind of stuck in that 18-29 mindset of “I am just not ready to be a parent”

    Birth rates in the future won’t be too much of a worry mind you. Robots and humans that don’t age will make up the bulk of the workforce. The economy will just tank because there wont be a trillion people buying things.

    • curiousPJ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am so surprised everyone is kind of stuck in that 18-29 mindset of “I am just not ready to be a parent”

      Is u blind?