• EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh, so you jumped in to defend someone while, admittedly, having no idea what was going on? I’m confused.

              • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t need the context of the situation to know either statement is true. If the guy had something with sex workers, I’d need more context to actually criticize those actions. As it stand though, sex work is fine, billionaires are bad, and billionaires supporting fascist genocides makes me wonder why we aren’t drawing and quartering.

  • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why we need to strengthen department of education. Otherwise these asshole billionaires will run education system like theirs own fiefdoms.

    Of course repubes want to get rid of department of education. Perfectly on brand.

  • Pronell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, tell the administrators to whip those students into shape, that’ll bring them around.

    Certainly won’t have any blowback in the least.

  • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    We need to just, like, cancel money. Fuck these twats and their useless ignorant influence. How dare you put education on the line to defend genocide

    garbage human

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    He’s pulling support from the school that’s cracking down so heavily and violently on the protests? What’s he for I’m having trouble understanding the logic here.

  • Chris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    No idea who he is but good for him. If more of the aristocracy announce themselves we will know who to not give a fuck about.

  • conquer4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    So he’s pulling support from the school, effectively he supports the protesters and staff who walked and not the school who is trying to make them go away. I don’t care about his mouth words, his actions matter more.

  • NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Schools are taking people’s free speech! Wait, I’m not donating to schools until they do it more! But to those I dislike!

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, it’s not an investor, just a donor. Almost all universities and colleges are non-profits, so they do not have investors.

      • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I dont really care what they are called. They donate not as charity but to get something in return. It can be promotion, goodwill, influence, access to top picks etc. That is IMO investing

        • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Sure, I get what you mean. But how do you stop that in any non-profit? It could be a local community organization that buys books for kids, then some rich guy donates a shit ton of specific books. You can’t stop people from donating, yknow?

          (edit: for the record, I was the upvote on that last comment, not the downvote. not trying to make this a fight)

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Actually, you can tell people “no thank you”… to go with your example, if the books donated were Mein Kampf or something like that.

          • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I am not arguing against donations. My point is them being depended on them. Some places it is free to go to university, college etc. medical care. Other places it costs a fee. There is no reason for them to become dependent on donations especially politicians

            Also who cares about up/down votes!?

            • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not saying I care about the votes. Just saying I don’t downvote people in a discussion (unless they are engaging in bad faith/trolling), since I noticed someone had downvoted your comment almost immediately.

              That being said, even in some countries with excellent health care standards, organizations depend on outside donations. I imagine a similar thing happens in education but I can’t say for sure, since it isn’t my field.

              Although, just for the sake of playing devil’s advocate, any system dependent on govt funding could be corrupted by the govt’s agenda, just like a donor could shape a nonprofit.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Almost all universities and colleges are non-profits

        That’s more a tax-dodge gambit than a reflection of their business policies.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Columbia has a $13.6B endowment, which has consistently grown at 8-10% annually.

      Kraft has historically donated in the $5M range annually. So, less than 1% of what the university earns on a portfolio whose principle never gets touched.