• Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 year ago

    He was given an indeterminate sentence, known as imprisonment for public protection (IPP). This meant that while he could be released after 19 months and 27 days, he could also be jailed for up to 99 years. IPP was first used as a sentence in England and Wales in 2005, having been introduced by Labour in 2003 to detain in prison people who posed a significant risk of causing harm to the public. It was a controversial sentence. Critics said that jailing people for what they could do, rather than what they had done, contradicted the basic principle of justice: that people are innocent until proven guilty.

    Yeah, no shit. Jesus Fucking Christ.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Holy shit.

      So basically anyone who is deemed enough of a nuisance can be indefinitely locked up?

    • ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I can almost understand the idea when applied to extremely dangerous individuals. There should absolutely be some kind of separate system for people who are too dangerous to be able to reintegrate into society.

      A one size fits all justice system is a terrible way to run a society