He was given an indeterminate sentence, known as imprisonment for public protection (IPP). This meant that while he could be released after 19 months and 27 days, he could also be jailed for up to 99 years. IPP was first used as a sentence in England and Wales in 2005, having been introduced by Labour in 2003 to detain in prison people who posed a significant risk of causing harm to the public. It was a controversial sentence. Critics said that jailing people for what they could do, rather than what they had done, contradicted the basic principle of justice: that people are innocent until proven guilty.
Yeah, no shit. Jesus Fucking Christ.
Holy shit.
So basically anyone who is deemed enough of a nuisance can be indefinitely locked up?
I can almost understand the idea when applied to extremely dangerous individuals. There should absolutely be some kind of separate system for people who are too dangerous to be able to reintegrate into society.
A one size fits all justice system is a terrible way to run a society
It’s definitely a fucked up sentence and he should have been released by now, but this headline is very misleading. He didn’t get arrested for “stealing a cigarette”, he got arrested for strong arm robbery. He was also a repeat offender who had previously been arrested for assault and theft. He for sure needed to go to jail, just not indefinitely
Yes he punched for being a racist bigot.
Do racist bigots deserve a good punch in the nose? Sure they do! Can we just walk around punching everyone who makes us mad though? No. That would result in everyone getting punched twice a day at least
Yes, because it’s an only way racist bigots learn.
Hitler is a prime example, he was imprisoned and went back to his party after his release.
We see the same thing with hate group leaders being arrested and going back to their movements after release.
This logic works well until someone stumbles along with the opinion that QuantumSpecter is a racist bigot and a clenched fist.
Okay let’s play the logic game
What’s the statical information on racist/bigot reoffending?
You completely ignored my point. We shouldn’t build a society where anyone can assault strangers on the streets because they perceive they might hold socially regressive views. Because that society would be one effectively void of rule of law.
Anyone who disagrees or dislikes someone else could violently attack them then claim they said something offensive.
This system could even enable racism. For example an Asian man (who is prejudiced against Latinos) could bash and Latino he saw then claim they called him a slur to justify their racial violence. Should an KKK member be able to fatality batter and black man he hears says a slur?
If we are playing the logic game this facially fails. And not that the burden for disproving your hypothesis with statistics would fall on me when you’ve yet to back it with any yourself.
No your point was that racist bigot should be prosecuted, so come on let’s hear the stats on hate crime reoffending?
Cool, cool… So I can just punch anyone in the face I want as long as you think they’re a bad person? I’ll make sure to tell that to the police when I get arrested 🙄
He had previous convictions for dangerous driving, assault, theft and burglary.
Get tae fuck, the guy’s an utter cunt and a burden on society
The police have their hands tied most of the time, of course they’ll throw the book at someone however they can
