cross-posted from: https://yall.theatl.social/post/3116914

From the Atlanta Daily World:

Photo: Getty Images A GOP lawmaker is facing backlash after referring to White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre as a “DEI hire.” On Tuesday (July 2), Colorado Rep. Lauren Boebert ® suggested that Jean-Pierre was only hired to fill a diversity quota. “I couldn’t care less about what @PressSec has to say today,” Boebert tweeted. … Continued

The post GOP Lawmaker Slammed For Calling White House Press Secretary ‘DEI Hire’ appeared first on Atlanta Daily World.

  • Pronell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    So DEI now just means the job went to a non-white, non-GOP, not-male person.

    Convenient.

    • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      They’ve been using “dei” instead of racial slurs for a while. It’s all a part of their toxic plan.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Isn’t it amazing that the people advocating for a “STricT mERITocrACY” conspicuously ignore their meritocracy is very monochromatic?

      • HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Are you denying she’s horrible at her job? She’s quite possibly the worst-spoken press secretary ever.

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I too would think that, had I just woken up from a coma and not known about the four press secretaries under Trump.

          Edit: oh wait, the felonious traitor had five:

          The Mooch, Spicer, Sarah “FuckTheCountry” Sanders, Stephanie “Never gave one press conference” Grisham and Kayleigh “My cross necklace proves how KKKhristian I am” McEnany.

    • Stern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      “Politically correct” is old news, “woke” is losing steam, so now we move to “DEI”.

      Just like how it used to be “Shell shock”, then it was “Battle Fatigue”, and now its PTSD.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      That’s what it always has meant. It threatens the heteronormative Christian patriarchal power structure to have anyone but a white man in charge of anything. And it doesn’t matter that a woman is saying it because it’s a woman who doesn’t understand that the leopards will eat her face too.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    First “gop lawmaker” is REALLY a far too generous stretch for a boebert descriptor. “gop participant and known public handjob aficionado” maybe…

    Second, the gop always DESPERATELY needs an acronym to funnel their implant hate through - seems clear that the emerging favorite these days is DEI with a hard “R”. Fucking cowards.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Right Wingers continue to just take terms and turn them into placeholders until they crank the hard R.

    Thug —+ Woke -----> DEI

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Ohhhh, You’re tough now, aren’t you motherfucker… HE’S A DEI!!! A DEI, DEI, DEI!!! Get his DEI ass out of here!!!”

    -transcript from inside the gop’s cavernous heads, rolling around next to the guilt for never actually reading the bible and the last 5 grindr messages they responded to

  • DogPeePoo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Ted Cruz’s former prostitute and abortion kompromat vessel called someone else DEI? That’s too rich.

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    A clock shaped like a pile of rancid garbage is still right twice a day, as harsh as it is.

    Karine Jean-Pierre is not a very good press secretary, And while I don’t know what the candidate pool was or what the vetting process was like, I think you’d be hard pressed to say that her being a black, LGBT, woman didn’t at all factor into her getting picked for the job. And while that’s not a bad thing, let’s not clutch our pearls and pretend calling her a DEI hire is some unhinged claim.

    Ask yourself this, do DEI hires exist? Yes, they often do. Does KJP tick literally all the boxes for a DEI hire? She absolutely does.

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      In this context, calling her “a DEI hire” means she’s not qualified. You’re saying she’s not qualified? Hey y’know who wasn’t a very good press secretary at all? Sean Spicer. Remember when he jumped in the bushes? He wasn’t a DEI hire was he? Nooooo. White men don’t need no steenking badges.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It doesn’t mean she’s unqualified, it just means more qualified candidates may have been passed over in favor of her because she’s more diverse. And considering how bad of a job she’s doing, if you are trying to make the claim that she WASN’T a DEI hire and she was hired solely because she was the best candidate, then you are making the claim that Biden and his cabinet are so incompetent that they can’t attract anyone talented who wants to work for them.

        And don’t deflect with “well the horrible people during Trump were worse!” Yea, no shit. It was the Trump presidency. That changes absolutely nothing about KJP and why she was hired.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          it just means more qualified candidates may have been passed over in favor of her because she’s more diverse.

          You’re taking this statement from Lauren Boebert and assuming there’s some validity to it. I just wanted you to know that.

        • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          So you don’t think DEI serves any useful purpose. That whenever you see people of color who aren’t good at their jobs they got those jobs just because they weren’t white. Or, just in this one, very-specific, very high-profile instance.

          Hey, I get it. I know a lot of people who think like that. They don’t mean to be - y’know - dismissive of DEI (of course in Ye Olden Tymes it was called Affirmative Action). Well . . some of them did. Oh man, some of them really did, y’know. But they were struggling with their own things, and it was the style at the time.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Do you say she’s not very good because you think she’s unqualified?

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karine_Jean-Pierre

      It seems to me she has a well-developed resumé, she has held several key posts in Democratic campaigns before landing the Press Secretary gig. She appears to be objectively qualified for her job. Much more so than

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lauren_Boebert

      Who owned a bunch of restaurants before running for office. Her main qualification semes to be that she talked some shit to an ex-member of the Cult of the Dead Cow. But the only vetting process she went through was an election.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I’m saying she’s not very good because of her many gaffs and avoidance of questions.

        And why compare her to Boebert? Boebert is a shit stain who’s unqualified to work at a fruit stand, let alone be a congresswoman. You bring up her qualifications like you think it’s some new info.

        I don’t understand how people think this type of deflection is worth anything. “You think this person is bad, well what about this other person who’s WORSE?!” Yea, that doesn’t make the first person better. This isn’t a fucking grade school popularity contest.

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Boebert is the one calling her a DEI hire, meanwhile Jean-Pierre has a Masters degree from Columbia and years of relevant experience.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            I know people with PhDs and decades of experience that are still shit at their jobs.

            I haven’t watched any of the White House press events so I don’t know how good she is at her job, but just having a nice resume doesn’t mean shit.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m saying she’s not very good because of her many gaffs and avoidance of questions.

          Yeah, totally unlike this very qualified white lady.