• chuckleslord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        There is evidence that it shortens attention spans. Can’t cause ADHD, however, because one of the diagnostic criteria is that it’s lifelong (must have symptoms present before age 12) and it’s something inherent to who you are.

        Also, entirely a special interest rant here, but ADD is no longer the term. ADHD is the term for the disorder and those who were diagnosed with ADD before now are considered ADHD Inattentive Type. Reason for the change is we don’t typically differentiate diagnoses based on symptom presentation. You don’t get the flu or the chilly flu, you just get the flu with chills as a symptom.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      According to a friend who moderates tiktok here in the US she swears that their jobs are secure. So is bytedance going block off US or not?

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    Getting this court to agree 9-0 on a politically sensitive case is pretty fuckin’ impressive. You want to regulate commerce with a foreign-owned entity for professed national security reasons, then you pass a law in Congress. That’s the way the US government is actually meant to function, and it’s sort of facepalmingly hilarious that they did something so stupid so well. If no one wants the law anymore, then it should be fairly simple to extend the deadline or repeal the law, riiiight? You own this mess now, Republicans. You own all the messes.

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m honestly shocked the SC took up the case. Congress clearly has the authority to regulate businesses doing interstate commerce (like tiktok). I think the law is dumb china hawkery, but I also think there’s nothing unconstitutional about it. Congress could shutdown nearly any tech business they like for whatever reason they like.

      • wjrii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, if not for all the people raising hell, I think this is normally one where they just agree to silently let the lower court ruling stand.

        As for the law, it’s stupid. I am willing to consider that there may be some concerns that are unique to a Chinese-owned social media app becoming so popular in the US, but we were nowhere near the tipping point where we needed specific TikTok legislation, and even if it were warranted then something much more narrowly tailored could have worked. It was a boomer kneejerk to come down so hard, and especially to do so without considering the potential for backlash among voters that both parties want to court. It also isn’t a good look that this all goes down while the mask is coming off of our homegrown social media, and it’s becoming more blatantly obvious that their interests are not particularly aligned with an average American’s either.

    • NegativeNull@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      3 months ago

      Zuck will convince him to keep the ban in place, as he benefits the most. There’s a reason Zuck has kissed the ring.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        As long as this country is going down the tubes, we should at least make some good TV out of it. Trump should hold a live fundraising event where “Pro-Tiktok Gratuity” and “Anti-Tiktok Gratuity” NFTs are marketed in real time. We can show the needle going back and forth, just like the NY Times does for elections. Whichever side wins gets to decide what happens to TikTok in the US. All gratuities (win or lose) go directly into the President’s own tip jar.

        Direct democracy in action! One Dollar, One Vote, just like the Founders intended.

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    170 million users in the United States.

    Tankies: But it’s just a lil Chinese app, why the US single out TiKTok‽

    That’s why. That’s an incredible amount of influence right there.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      While I could not give less of a shit about TikTok except as a possible personal source of revenue for people who want to hire me to make videos for them, I’m a hell of a lot more worried about the influence of Facebook, Instagram and Twitter now that you’re allowed to do things like call queer people mentally ill pedophiles and immigrants are dirty criminals.

      And this is why. Facebook is allowing exactly the same thing that they allowed to foment genocide in Myanmar: https://www.404media.co/meta-is-laying-the-narrative-groundwork-for-trumps-mass-deportations-2/

      • takeda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Both sides can be bad, with TikTok the problem is that it is controlled by an adversary, a nation that doesn’t have good relationship with the US and wants it to collapse.

        Frankly if I had power I would go after Twitter and Meta as well.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          the problem is that it is controlled by an adversary

          As opposed to billionaires working with the trump admin…

          If you don’t think this is adversarial government, I won’t try to convince you, it’ll keep getting more and more obvious

          • takeda@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            You won’t find me supporting Twitter or Meta, and I won’t deny that their owners do seem to be influenced by foreign governments (directly or indirectly), but TikTok is clearly information Domain Warfare and it would be hell of a stupid to continue allowing it if they are still controlled by Chinese government. This is why that sale is for.

            https://youtu.be/9JQLaf4QaOs?t=6m51s

            If TikTok wasn’t a weapon, wouldn’t it make more sense to sell it and get something than not selling it and have nothing?

            The current behavior only makes sense if the real value was being China’s propaganda piece. A normal business would just go after money.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              You think the French nobility fund d US revolutionaries because they were upset about taxes?

              If a country is doing something in another country, it’s for selfish reasons 99% of the time.

              If China wants to allow a place for people to complain about trump not controlled by a billionaire in Trump’s side…

              What they get out of it isn’t the primary concern. It’s helping the American people even if only done to fuck with Trump’s administration

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s not an either/or thing, both can be bad, both should be banned or at least heavily regulated. Right now we got one banned so far so I’ll take it

        • takeda@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          or at least heavily regulated

          That’s the core reason for requirement to sell it. Right now there’s no way to regulate it. It is an app that influences 17 million Americans controlled by a country that right now regularly conducted cyber attacks on our infrastructure. What could go wrong?