"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agoControversial questionlemmy.worldimagemessage-square30linkfedilinkarrow-up1962arrow-down111
arrow-up1951arrow-down1imageControversial questionlemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square30linkfedilink
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoI would argue voting for a candidate you know will lose with certainty is not a vote for or against anything.
minus-squarechuckleslord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoCool definition. Still not a majority.
I would argue voting for a candidate you know will lose with certainty is not a vote for or against anything.
Cool definition. Still not a majority.