• halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    5 months ago

    For those that don’t know, even if the annual vaccination doesn’t target the dominant specific strain that year, it still provides more protection than no vaccine!

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Ehhhh it depends. If the strain is really far off from what’s in that year’s vaccine, not really. The closer the relationship, the better the protection. Obviously I’m not saying anybody should skip vaccination but it isn’t that simple

      • minnow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        You misunderstood. They mean that the vaccine is still protecting from the strains that ARE in it, so it’s not reasonable to forego the vaccine just because of one strain that’s not in it.

  • redbrick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    As I understand it…the northern and southern hemisphere depend on each other in determining which strain to include in the vaccine. So the north looks at what has happened in the south to determine what to include in the north for the next season right? So I wonder…why do this? Why not just include all 14 of the known strains and be done with it? Is there an incompatibility that we don’t know about? Asking for a friend…