Credit to @spaceinnutshell
Science can be proven wrong… by more science. It’s not that hard of a concept.
Sure but if it is easily debunked in a youtube video by a kon scientist I wonder if we should be regarding that particular topic as science.
If you are in a position to criticize other people’s science, youtube is probably not the platform of choice.
I can’t speak for the millions of videos on YouTube and I clearly haven’t watched as many science videos as the next guy, but I won’t rule it out entirely if the person backs it up with actual science. Psuedo science like RFK wasn’t something they cited on YouTube. Science must prove itself.
Crediting Ai slop 🤮
"According to my research " proceeds to copy and paste from Facebook
They would never allow him to speak. They will simply silence him with numbers and throw him off the edge of the earth before letting the truth out.
This is only true until you realize that a lot of modern science is built upon foundations of systemic discrimination that excluded women and minorities. Only new researching can prove old research wrong, and the lack of funding for catching up in inclusivity in science has led to the status quo of outdated beliefs permeating STEM but dressed in a lab coat of credibility.
Research on women’s health and medicine lags behind men’s by decades due to the historical exclusion of women in studies and the refusal to treat them as credible witnesses to their own bodies’ symptoms. Magnitudes of more money has been poured into ED than endometriosis, an agonizing condition that gets dismissed as ‘just a period’ by doctors.
