From its towering white steeple and red-brick facade to its Sunday services filled with rousing gospel hymns and evangelistic sermons, First Baptist Church of Alexandria, Virginia, bears many of the classic hallmarks of a Southern Baptist church.

On a recent Sunday, its pastor for women and children, Kim Eskridge, urged members to invite friends and neighbors to an upcoming vacation Bible school — a perennial Baptist activity — to help “reach families in the community with the gospel.”

But because that pastor is a woman, First Baptist’s days in the Southern Baptist Convention may be numbered.

At the SBC’s annual meeting June 11-12 in Indianapolis, representatives will vote on whether to amend the denomination’s constitution to essentially ban churches with any women pastors — and not just in the top job. That measure received overwhelming approval in a preliminary vote last year.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    1 Timothy 2:12 is fairly clear on the matter.

    But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

    but the flip side is they can ignore that just like they ignore prohibitions on eating shrimp and wearing polycotton blends.


    As an atheist I don’t have skin in the game either way.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      As an atheist I don’t have skin in the game either way.

      You do, because religious extremists constantly use their texts as an excuse for why they have to support certain legislation.

      Everyone that say they have to be against abortion or LGBT people existing because their Sky Daddy said to, also think other stuff like what you quoted needs to be law too.

      They just know they don’t have the political power yet.

      But if they could, they’d push for women to not be allowed to hold office, have a management position, or even vote.

      This 100% effects all of us, regardless of if we believe in their Sky Daddy.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.

      -Matthew 5:17

      Christians interpret this as stating they don’t need to follow the Old Testament rules as Jesus has fulfilled them and has established a new covenant with his death on the cross.

      • Aermis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. This. What was considered clean and unclean to eat was amended in Peter’s vision in acts 10. So was clothing and much else of levitical law during jesus’ gospel.

        Even Paul’s writings about women speaking above men needs to take into context that the church in Ephesus (modern day turkey) was led by young Timothy. The theme was pretty strict to reestablish a baseline of roles and law to apply to Ephesus, which was seen as very immoral, murderous and rebellious. I mean Paul says people should stay celibate and not marry because this can complicate a person’s relationship with God.

        Without going too deep, no, this doesn’t mean women shouldn’t teach because “god” demands women to be inferior/subjugated.

        If that was so why did God use women as prophets and leaders?

      • Stern@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Christians interpret this as stating they don’t need to follow the Old Testament rules

        Except for stuff like Leviticus 18:22 (the oft quoted anti-gay one) ofc.

        Religious hypocrites will say the bible says X about things and pick some vaguely related verse or story to justify it. From the Curse of Ham justifying slavery to Leviticus 19:19 being used to justify miscegenation laws.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not all branches have a hard on for Old Testament stuff that validates their regressive ideas, but yeah you’re right that many do, especially the evangelical thumpers

      • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which is a really weird interpretation considering the very next sentence in Matthew 5:18:

        “18 For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.”

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      but the flip side is they can ignore that just like they ignore prohibitions on eating shrimp and wearing polycotton blends.

      Because Paul threw out the rules but added in a few of his own. Also to be fair this isn’t really Paul this is a guy pretending to be Paul.

      It’s funny rereading all his tiresome letters and remembering that all the arguments he is presenting he claims to have gotten in one blinding vision.

      • wjrii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Paul, or rather the amalgamation of Paul and the various authors of the texts canonized as the Pauline epistles, was a fuckin’ dick man of his place and time, and including the letters in the Bible really fucked up Christianity over the long-term.

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Much of the laws in the epistles (letters that make up the bulk of the New Testament) are cultural, related to their time in the Roman Empire. This is why plenty of churches feel comfortable saying women can be pastors, gay people are totally fine, etc.

      Just not the loud, shitty ones that make all the news and try to force their religious restrictions down the throats of others.

    • no banana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t care what they do as long as it doesn’t affect me or people who don’t believe as they do.