• Rottcodd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Literally, officially, it’s now entirely legal under federal law for officials to accept and even solicit bribes for specific services rendered, just so long as they do it after, rather than before, the service is rendered.

    They aren’t even pretending to be a legitimate court of law any more - they’re just a rubber-stamping service for the oligarchy.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is some third world shit going down. Hey America: long term violent protests combined with a general strike.

    Plan a a date, print up flyers. Do it.

  • rjthyen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    A “donation” up front says I’ll see what I can do, money after the fact says I’ll fight for you. Sounds like bribery to me. Not that the current system isn’t but backend feels so much worse

  • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    What happened to “legislating from the bench”? Pepperidge Farm remembers when repubes were against it

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      In short it’s typically limited to when judges make things up whole cloth, like qualified immunity, without legal basis. In judicial circles striking down laws or saying a law isn’t applicable in a certain circumstance typically isn’t regarded as legislating as they are ruling on the justness and applicability of an existing law rather than creating something wholely new.

  • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s amazing how almost every job not in the government already acknowledges and penalises this as a crime. But because these folks actually instate the rules they have to follow their somehow exempt from the same standards.

  • FireTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Although a gratuity or reward offered and accepted by a state or local official after the official act may be unethical or illegal under other federal, state, or local laws, the gratuity does not violate §666.

    Tldr the ruling only was about in relation to one law. The party may be guilty of a form of corruption under a different law.