• FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        And you may find yourself behind the wheel of a large automobile. And you may ask yourself, “Well, how did I get here?”

        Thanks to the Supreme Court, that’s how

  • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    So that means that I can engage in a a little tax evasion, as a treat, right?

    On a serious note, from the article:

    the law makes it a very serious crime, punishable by up to 15 years in prison, for a federal official to accept a bribe

    Can we start actually enforcing this please?

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Define bribe and you’ll start to see where enforcing this becomes a problem. Especially with legalized corruption in the form of lobbying and ‘gifts’.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Legislators, executives, and jurists aren’t officials in the sense you mean. They are referring to government employees, who can still receive every joyful punishment a prosecutor can dream of.

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well, perhaps the wording should be amended to encompass all public employees. But that would require the law be rewritten by the people that benefit from it, so, yeah.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      SCOTUS has routinely bent over backwards to protect politicians from corruption and bribery charges though so the message is clear. You cannot charge a politician with bribery except in extreme circumstances. Like them being a democrat.

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      “At every level” she’s making specific reference to a specific certain level in the US judicial system here… Some pretty good, brave activism three - good luck getting your mom a house from a billionaire now Justice Jackson

      • I_Clean_Here@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Your comment is nonsensical. Format that shit. And wtf, are you saying Judge Jackson is corrupt as well? You are making no sense.

        • TimmyDeanSausage @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Their formatting was dog dukey, but I was still able to parse what they were saying fairly easily. They’re saying “good job judge Jackson. Too bad you won’t be able to get a free house from insert evil billionaire here (/s)”. While I agree with your sentiment, the way you go about pointing these things out can backfire, if done with a rude tone, such as the way you chose to do it. There you go; an unsolicited constructive criticism for an unsolicited constructive criticism. :)

  • OldChicoAle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    So is the difference “I’ll give you money to do this thing” versus “I’ll give you money if you do this thing”?

    They both sound like bribes to me. Money, goods, or services are just handed over at different times.

    I fucking hate these people. No shame. No morals. No humanity.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        Then they at the end they give that know an extra twist by specifically mentioning two justices notorious for receiving substantial bribes rewards who didn’t feel the need to recuse themselves.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    9 months ago

    i love how the standard went from “the appearance of impropriety” to “you know what, just leave the money on the counter”.

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      NOT THAT COUNTER!!! That is the bribe counter! You put it NEXT the bribe counter so nobody gets the wrong idea.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        No that’s fine too, we’ll just blow up the journalist and bury the story. #PanamaPapers

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 months ago

    I didn’t think they could weaken it any further, you already had to get caught on tape exchanging money, laughing maniacally, and saying, “This is a bribe for X action.”

    Now you can do that, as long as it happens after the politician delivers. That’s a kickback. It’s the fucking definition of a kickback. They gave someone a contract and the contractor then gave the contract giver a large sum of money.

  • MeatPilot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Next up “donor” patches for clothing, donor branded shoes, and donor outfits. Have our state officials look like NASCAR.

      • Nicoleism101@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        9 months ago

        Whether it is legal or not is the whole crux of the thing…

        If it isn’t legal then it is purely a matter of the skill of law enforcement. If it is legal then well, condolences.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          it is purely a matter of the skill of law enforcement

          This is America. Law enforcement exists to protect the rich and powerful, especially from this sort of thing. The politicians get caught are just too stupid to figure out how to hide it.

          Also, as others have pointed out, this doesn’t actually legalize corruption.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              That’s the bigger thing to have condolences about, honestly. In general, if you’re rich and powerful, you can do whatever the hell you want in the U.S. and the law will be on your side. That’s one of the reasons why it’s so amazing that Trump was found guilty in the New York trial.

              • Nicoleism101@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                I hear you, well that’s just plain depressing, hope it changes at some point. Sometimes it has to get worse to get better.

                When the illusion of a successful country dissipates that’s when the real changes can be introduced.

                Unrestrained capitalism will never solve your country mounting problems that one I am sure. At some point the problems will become too severe to brainwash even the most easily influenced voters. As long as they have it good or ok, they can be recruited but there’s a limit and populism is inherently short-sighted and thus short-lived. It’s akin to burst of anger out of denial that can’t survive long in it’s powerful but unstable state of constant crisis. Trump is a harbringer of change and a proof that we hate changes but there’s nothing anyone can do to stop them and those trumps and such only accelerate the inevitable societal progress. I wouldn’t say let him rule because this would be unfair to many people but it will eventually pass and will be a building block for the better tomorrow.

                There’s no power in the world that could bring back catholic medieval society at this point.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          If it is legal then well, condolences.

          Law enforcement still has their… ways. They might suddenly find bad of white powder.