• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      87
      ·
      9 months ago

      The lengths people will go through to stop something that hurts nobody, but helps many always astounds me.

      I have to credit some rando Redditor for the insight that helped me understand why these people do this. I’ll paraphrase because I can’t remember the exact prose.

      Nearly all actions of Conservatives can be explained by their two implied core principles:

      1. All policies are zero sum. For you to gain something means I am losing something.
      2. There is a naturally occurring societal class-based hierarchy system, and you are required to stay at your level, never rising.

      So the reason conservatives oppose student loan relief applies to both rules.

      1. If student loan borrowers are having debts forgiven (they are getting something) that MUST mean the conservative is losing something.
      2. If they had to take loans for school because they couldn’t afford to pay for it outright, then they should stay in their economic station. Forgiving these loans may allow them to advance beyond their current class, which cannot be allowed.
      • ramble81@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        9 months ago

        Which number 2 blows my mind as they constantly vote for things which benefit those well “above their station” because they think they’ll be there someday.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          because they think they’ll be there someday.

          Sadly, I think its even worse than you’re describing. They think they are at that higher station now and its rule #1 that is preventing them from actualizing it. As in “I’m not experiencing a luxurious lifestyle because Group X is taking my share”.

        • ElJefe@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          My friend ran into a mutual acquaintance; dude’s now a majorly homophobic, anti trans, anti lgbtq, far right, freedumb convoy supporting redneck. You know the type. He’s ranting about how social programs need to be defunded and all the gays do is take and don’t contribute. My buddy then goes “so anyway, how’ve you been?” Dude says “oh I’m great! I got laid off so now I’m on employment insurance.”

          Their hypocrisy and tone deafness know no bounds.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          I don’t think it’s even that anymore. I think it’s just genuine fawning sycophancy towards their “betters.” They think privileged people deserve even more privilege by virtue of having “won,” even at their own expense. It’s sick and psychotic and completely foreign to my way of thinking, but I don’t think I’m wrong.

          • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            You are wrong though. The reason we can’t understand it is they are being manipulated. Christians in particular have made themselves vulnerable, purposefully. Just go back to your Sunday school days and if you didn’t have them listen to the TV preachers in earnest. They are the sheep, they are being led. I’m not trying to be offense it’s just the facts. Even the trumpers who are church adverse fall for similar structures. Usually satellites of the church at large. Biggest facet I can think of is the gun nuts. It’s basically religion. In the 2A they trust. The overlap of the church gives them the same structure. Making them vulnerable to manipulation.

            You and me too though. We just kinda sweep it under the rug. We let our phones run our lives. We feed on dopamine hits all day everyday.

      • LengAwaits@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        As Voltaire said: “The comfort of the rich depends upon an abundant supply of the poor.”

        The idea broadly underpins modern capitalism, and it sums up why liberal politicians (whether left or right wing) do nearly everything they do. Democratic liberals want to keep the lower classes at least somewhat happy by throwing them scraps from time to time, while Republican liberals will only ever do just enough to keep the lower classes pacified.

        • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Almost all the quality of life in the US is at the expense of the real global poor. Even our american minimum wage workers going into debt, living paycheck to paycheck actually live a life of privilege compared to billions despite the perceived suffering.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Don’t forget cruelty. If you aren’t in their circle or above it’s also about cruelty.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 months ago

          Thats built into #2. If your station is low enough, you should expect to endure cruelty. Its your station after all…is their implied position.

      • madcaesar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t know about the second one, that one sounds like left fan fiction, but #1 is absolutely true.

        As #2 I’d put “If something bad happened to you, IE student debt, it’s your fault so you should be punished. If something bad happens to me, it’s bad luck or societies fault, therefore I need help.”

      • Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Fun fact, in the 1920s a high caste Indian man sued the US for the right to naturalize arguing that he was white. Arguing that he was verifiably genetically pure because of his caste and descendant from the Aryans.

        The Supreme Court, 9 old white dudes, decided that he didn’t look white enough to be white. And so he wasn’t white, and denied him the right to naturalize.

        'murica

  • Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    9 months ago

    We are being governed by unelected judges. We need to reform the court system (starting at the top)

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      And unelected president… remember, we don’t actually vote the president into office. Instead, we vote, and if they feel like it, a bunch of random electors of the exclusive electoral college club actually elect our president.

      That sounds fucking retarded to allow to do, yet, somehow, every time I bring it up, some idiot professor of history defends that. Like ohh, our grandfathers were so smart, they built that into the constitution… They also owned minorities and made them do the hard work around the house.

  • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    9 months ago

    Remember, the president is absolutely above the law and can commit a coup or order political assassinations with impunity. But he can’t make decisions about how to implement policies, even when congress gives him that authority.

    • meleethecat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The seems like the perfect chance to use that immunity. He should use it to sign an executive order to cancel all student debt based on the supreme court decision. Let the republicans object and force the court to either allow it or rule that the president doesn’t actually have immunity.

      • Omega@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        The problem is that you have to find a way to cancel it before anyone can say no. But if it takes any time at all, they can tell those agencies to stop.

        • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Exactly. Do it right now while they are on vacation.

          Oops, sorry, you robe wearing psychopaths, guess you should not have gone gargling billionaire balls.

  • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    9 months ago

    Biden should decree it as an official act, and order the branches to do it anyway.

    Call their Bluff, and better yet do it with a “low stakes” issue so they have to put up or shut up.

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Its open faced at this point, this kind of shit will continue until the rulings are ignored. The reason student loans got so much focus is because unlike other legislation proposals, student loans are entirely at the discretion of the department of education under the executive branch. Like how the DEA has authority over drug scheduling.

    The executive branch has these authorities, the judiciary does not have the authority to rescind them, only congress can

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      this kind of shit will continue until the rulings are ignored.

      Say it louder for the low-information voters in the back.

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      The judiciary can strike them down for Congress having delegated their power. Judicial review has long been appreciated to be the province of the judiciary. The blame for this lies squarely with the legislature, the most accountable form of government. Vote.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.eeBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Good! If we allow Working Class Americans to have MORE MONEY we WON’T have enough to give to Jeff Bezos so he can buy another Yacht for his Yacht!

  • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I’m not a lawyer.

    The article kinda sucks on educational value.

    Summary:

    To sort out a legal mess two circuit courts made with contradictory rulings about the nature of student loan repayments, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued an order to halt the SAVE program’s implementation entirely, temporarily, until they issue a final ruling.

    The order is likely legally binding in all subordinate Federal Circuit Courts with jurisdiction over: Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota.

    Editorial:

    It’s fucked, like a judicial system filibuster.

  • TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    Wow. The popups on Forbes are bad. I had one covering the lower third until another ad popped up, covering the whole screen of my phone. I literally had one ad blocking another ad.

    • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I wonder if marketers realize I’m so desensitized to ads that I have no idea what any given one is even for. I’m just looking for a way to close the damn thing. If I can’t, I leave the site entirely, still with no idea of what product or service they were trying to shove down my throat.

      Shirley I’m not the only one like this.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    If the youngsters don’t see that it is the Republicans and Republicans only who are hurting them any chance they get, I don’t see how that education helped them any.

    If I was a millennial I’d be fucking livid and organizing voter registration drives all over the country.

    They are literally stealing any hope of a future before your eyes and if you think not voting is going to send a message, it is. The message is: Keep fucking us, Republicans and don’t use any lube.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think most millennials are pretty solidly left, while also having no illusions about the fact that the establishment democratic party are centrist on their best day and right wing on their worst (we can’t stop the fascists, that would make the people who don’t vote for us upset and they might continue to not vote for us).

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 months ago

    Do you know how small a number 8 million is in comparison to the entire US population? And these assholes are still trying to block it. Fucking sick of this shit.